ArticleScientific reports2021
Electromagnetic surgical navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Integration of Virtual Planning, Navigation, and Robotic Microsurgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Current State of Intraoperative Imaging in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dynamic navigation-assisted extraction of impacted maxillary anterior teeth: a model-based accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Model experiments on application of oral and maxillofacial surgical robot-assisted mandibular tumor resection and reconstruction.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Application of navigation system during surgery for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Needle Manipulation Controller Subject to Uncertainty of Tip Pose Feedback: A Simulation Study.... International Symposium on Medical Robotics. International Symposium on Medical Robotics · 2025Article
- Hybrid registration of the fibula for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies in mandibular reconstructive surgery: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Patient-specific dynamic reference frame for navigation-assisted surgery in mandible: a novel noninvasive technical method.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Application of dynamic navigation technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Review
- Preliminary study of the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted mandibular distraction osteogenesis with electromagnetic navigation in hemifacial microsomia using rabbit models.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Utilization of a 3D printed dental splint for registration during electromagnetically navigated mandibular surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of electromagnetic (EM) navigation for guidance on osteotomies in patients undergoing oncologic mandibular surgery. Preoperatively, a 3D rendered model of the mandible was constructed from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) images. Cutting guides and patient specific reconstruction plates were designed and printed for intraoperative use. Intraoperative patient registration was performed using a cone beam CT scan (CBCT). The location of the mandible was tracked with an EM sensor fixated to the mandible. The real-time location of both the mandible and a pointer were displayed on the navigation system. Accuracy measurements were performed by pinpointing four anatomical landmarks and four landmarks on the cutting guide using the pointer on the patient and comparing these locations to the corresponding locations on the CBCT. Differences between actual and virtual locations were expressed as target registration error (TRE). The procedure was performed in eleven patients. TREs were 3.2 ± 1.1 mm and 2.6 ± 1.5 mm using anatomical landmarks and landmarks on the cutting guide, respectively. The navigation procedure added on average half an hour to the duration of the surgery. This is the first study that reports on the accuracy of EM navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.