ArticleScientific reports2021
Comparative evaluation of expiratory airflow limitation between patients with COPD and BE using IOS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exacerbation Burden and Peripheral Airway Dysfunction as Determinants of Quality of Life in Bronchiectasis: Insights from Impulse Oscillometry.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Bronchiectasis Assessment in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Non-Invasive Approach Using Forced Oscillation Technique.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Potentiality of impulse oscillometry to evaluate bronchodilator reversibility in untreated adult patients with newly diagnosed asthma.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Article
- Challenges in Diagnosing Occupational Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) allows evaluation of the compartmentalized resistance and reactance of the respiratory system, distinguishing central and peripheral obstruction. The IOS measurements are getting attention in the diagnosis and differentiation of chronic respiratory diseases. However, no data are available in the literature to differentiate between COPD and BE using IOS parameters. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of IOS in the diagnosis of bronchiectasis non-cystic fibrosis (BE) in comparison to COPD. Whole breath, inspiration, expiration, and inspiratory-expiratory difference (Δ) were evaluated based on the IOS parameters: total resistance (R5), central airway resistance (R20), peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20), reactance (X5), reactance area (AX), and resonance frequency (Fres). Fifty-nine subjects (21 Healthy, 19 BE, and 19 COPD) participated in this study. It was observed a significant difference in the comparison of healthy and pulmonary disease groups (BE and COPD) for total breathing (R5-R20, X5, AX, and Fres), inspiratory phase (R5 and R5-R5), and expiratory phase (R5-R20 and X5). The comparison between BE and COPD groups showed significant difference in the expiratory phase for resistance at 5 and 20 Hz and, ΔR5 and ΔR20. The IOS evidenced an increase of R5, R20 and R5-R20 in patients with BE and COPD when compared to healthy subjects. Expiratory measures of IOS revealed increased airway resistance in COPD compared to BE patients who had similar FEV1 measured by spirometry, however, further studies are needed to confirm these differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.