Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633231›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Comparison of the onset time between 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized-controlled trial.

Ha-Jung Kim, Sooho Lee, Ki Jinn Chin, Jin-Sun Kim, Hyungtae Kim, Young-Jin Ro, Won Uk Koh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03679897 (0.25% Levobupivacaine Versus 0.375% Ropivacaine), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03679897 phase4completednot on this map

0.25% Levobupivacaine Versus 0.375% Ropivacaine: a Comparative Study in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2018 to 2018Enrolled46ConditionsRegional AnesthesiaArmsRopivacaine solution, Levobupivacaine solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ha-Jung KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Sooho LeeDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, 22711, Korea.
Ki Jinn ChinDepartment of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jin-Sun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Hyungtae KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Young-Jin RoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Won Uk KohDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. koh9726@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At centers with pressure on rapid operating room turnover, onset time is one of the important considerations for choosing a local anesthetic drug. To hasten the onset of the block, higher concentrations of local anesthetics are sometimes used. However, the use of diluted local anesthetics may be safer. Therefore, we aimed to compare the onset times of equipotential levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentrations for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Adult patients undergoing upper extremity surgery under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block at our center were randomly allocated to the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block was induced with 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine depending on the assigned group. The degrees of sensory and motor blockade were assessed for 40 min after the administration of local anesthetics. A total of 46 patients were included in the analysis. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.375% ropivacaine provided sufficient surgical anesthesia. The sensory onset time of 0.375% ropivacaine was shorter than that of 0.25% levobupivacaine (group R, 15 [15.0-22.5] min; group L, 30 [17.5-35.0] min, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other block characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. Thus, when a quicker block onset is required, 0.375% ropivacaine is a better choice than 0.25% levobupivacaine.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03679897).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalBrachial Plexus BlockFemaleHumansLevobupivacaineMaleMiddle AgedRopivacaineUltrasonography, InterventionalUpper ExtremityAnesthetics, LocalLevobupivacaineRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID33633231
PMCPMC7907375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.