Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633197›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Deep learning identification for citizen science surveillance of tiger mosquitoes.

Balint Armin Pataki, Joan Garriga, Roger Eritja, John R B Palmer, Frederic Bartumeus, Istvan Csabai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Innovations in public health surveillance: An overview of novel use of data and analytic methods.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Balint Armin PatakiDepartment of Physics of Complex System, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. patbaa@caesar.elte.hu.
Joan GarrigaCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), 17300, Girona, Spain.
Roger EritjaCREAF, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain.
John R B PalmerUniversitat Pompeu Fabra, 08005, Barcelona, Spain.
Frederic BartumeusCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), 17300, Girona, Spain.
Istvan CsabaiDepartment of Physics of Complex System, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes · ESCentre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESPompeu Fabra University · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global monitoring of disease vectors is undoubtedly becoming an urgent need as the human population rises and becomes increasingly mobile, international commercial exchanges increase, and climate change expands the habitats of many vector species. Traditional surveillance of mosquitoes, vectors of many diseases, relies on catches, which requires regular manual inspection and reporting, and dedicated personnel, making large-scale monitoring difficult and expensive. New approaches are solving the problem of scalability by relying on smartphones and the Internet to enable novel community-based and digital observatories, where people can upload pictures of mosquitoes whenever they encounter them. An example is the Mosquito Alert citizen science system, which includes a dedicated mobile phone app through which geotagged images are collected. This system provides a viable option for monitoring the spread of various mosquito species across the globe, although it is partly limited by the quality of the citizen scientists' photos. To make the system useful for public health agencies, and to give feedback to the volunteering citizens, the submitted images are inspected and labeled by entomology experts. Although citizen-based data collection can greatly broaden disease-vector monitoring scales, manual inspection of each image is not an easily scalable option in the long run, and the system could be improved through automation. Based on Mosquito Alert's curated database of expert-validated mosquito photos, we trained a deep learning model to find tiger mosquitoes (Aedes albopictus), a species that is responsible for spreading chikungunya, dengue, and Zika among other diseases. The highly accurate 0.96 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score promises not only a helpful pre-selector for the expert validation process but also an automated classifier giving quick feedback to the app participants, which may help to keep them motivated. In the paper, we also explored the possibilities of using the model to improve future data collection quality as a feedback loop.

Indexed as

CulicidaeDeep LearningMosquito VectorsAnimal DistributionAnimalsCitizen ScienceHumansMobile ApplicationsMosquito ControlSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID33633197
PMCPMC7907246
OpenAlexW3129306967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.