ArticleScientific reports2021
Utility of CT texture analysis to differentiate olfactory neuroblastoma from sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Prognosis of Neuroblastoma - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics of the Paranasal Sinuses: A Systematic Review of Computer-Assisted Techniques to Assess Computed Tomography Radiological Data.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating CT radiomics and morphologic features for preoperative risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning models for differentiating three sinonasal malignancies using multi-sequence MRI.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- The Evolution and Application of Artificial Intelligence in Rhinology: A State of the Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Review
- A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Research in Rhinology.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine differences in texture features between olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images, and to evaluate the predictive accuracy of texture analysis compared to radiologists' interpretations. Forty-three patients with pathologically-diagnosed primary nasal and paranasal tumor (17 ONB and 26 SCC) were included. We extracted 42 texture features from tumor regions on CECT images obtained before treatment. In univariate analysis, each texture features were compared, with adjustment for multiple comparisons. In multivariate analysis, the elastic net was used to select useful texture features and to construct a texture-based prediction model with leave-one-out cross-validation. The prediction accuracy was compared with two radiologists' visual interpretations. In univariate analysis, significant differences were observed for 28 of 42 texture features between ONB and SCC, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.68 and 0.91 (median: 0.80). In multivariate analysis, the elastic net model selected 18 texture features that contributed to differentiation. It tended to show slightly higher predictive accuracy than radiologists' interpretations (86% and 74%, respectively; P = 0.096). In conclusion, several texture features contributed to differentiation of ONB from SCC, and the texture-based prediction model was considered useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.