Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633150›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

CIBERSORT analysis of TCGA and METABRIC identifies subgroups with better outcomes in triple negative breast cancer.

Kelly E Craven, Yesim Gökmen-Polar, Sunil S Badve

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. γδ T cells and cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing the significance of CCNE1 overexpression in triple negative breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E CravenDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Yesim Gökmen-PolarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Sunil S BadveDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. sbadve@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have shown that the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is associated with better prognosis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these immune cell differences are not well delineated. In this study, analysis of hematoxylin and eosin images from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer cohort failed to show a prognostic benefit of TILs in TNBC, whereas CIBERSORT analysis, which quantifies the proportion of each immune cell type, demonstrated improved overall survival in TCGA TNBC samples with increased CD8 T cells or CD8 plus CD4 memory activated T cells and in Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) TNBC samples with increased gamma delta T cells. Twenty-five genes showed mutational frequency differences between the TCGA high and low T cell groups, and many play important roles in inflammation or immune evasion (ATG2B, HIST1H2BC, PKD1, PIKFYVE, TLR3, NOTCH3, GOLGB1, CREBBP). Identification of these mutations suggests novel mechanisms by which the cancer cells attract immune cells and by which they evade or dampen the immune system during the cancer immunoediting process. This study suggests that integration of mutations with CIBERSORT analysis could provide better prediction of outcomes and novel therapeutic targets in TNBC cases.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33633150
PMCPMC7907367
OpenAlexW3130781357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.