Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Protocol for preparation of heterogeneous biological samples for 3D electron microscopy: a case study for insects.

Alexey A Polilov, Anastasia A Makarova, Song Pang, C Shan Xu, Harald Hess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Olfaction with legs-Spiders use wall-pore sensilla for pheromone detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Organ-resolved lipid mapping inFrontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexey A PolilovDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. polilov@gmail.com.
Anastasia A MakarovaDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Song PangJanelia Research Campus of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA.
C Shan XuJanelia Research Campus of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA.
Harald HessJanelia Research Campus of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USLomonosov Moscow State University · RUJanelia Research Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern morphological and structural studies are coming to a new level by incorporating the latest methods of three-dimensional electron microscopy (3D-EM). One of the key problems for the wide usage of these methods is posed by difficulties with sample preparation, since the methods work poorly with heterogeneous (consisting of tissues different in structure and in chemical composition) samples and require expensive equipment and usually much time. We have developed a simple protocol allows preparing heterogeneous biological samples suitable for 3D-EM in a laboratory that has a standard supply of equipment and reagents for electron microscopy. This protocol, combined with focused ion-beam scanning electron microscopy, makes it possible to study 3D ultrastructure of complex biological samples, e.g., whole insect heads, over their entire volume at the cellular and subcellular levels. The protocol provides new opportunities for many areas of study, including connectomics.

Indexed as

AnimalsImaging, Three-DimensionalInsectaMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Electron, Transmission

Identifiers

PMID33633143
PMCPMC7907262
OpenAlexW3130613343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.