Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632904›Full record

Trial reportSaudi medical journal2021

The effect of low flow anesthesia on hemodynamic and peripheral oxygenation parameters in obesity surgery.

Mesut Öterkuş, İlksen Dönmez, Aysu H Nadir, İbrahim Rencüzoğulları, Yavuz Karabağ, Kenan Binnetoğlu

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06636448 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Patient Outcomes During Low-flow Anaesthesia for Major Gynaecological Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsMajor Gynecological Cancer Surgery, Low Flow AnesthesiaArmsthe effect of body mass index during low-flow anesthesia
NCT06896604 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Low-Flow and High-Flow Desflurane Anesthesia on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgeries

TypeobservationalSponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled64ConditionsOptic Nerve Sheath DiameterArmsOcular Ultrasonography for measuring Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Comparative Study on Minimal Flow Anaesthesia in Geriatric and Middle-aged Patients.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mesut ÖterkuşFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Öterkuş), Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Dönmez), Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Nadir), Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir; and from the Department of Cardiology (Rencüzoğulları, Karabağ), Department of General Surgery (Binnetoğlu), Medical Faculty, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
İlksen DönmezFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Öterkuş), Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Dönmez), Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Nadir), Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir; and from the Department of Cardiology (Rencüzoğulları, Karabağ), Department of General Surgery (Binnetoğlu), Medical Faculty, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Aysu H NadirFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Öterkuş), Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Dönmez), Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Nadir), Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir; and from the Department of Cardiology (Rencüzoğulları, Karabağ), Department of General Surgery (Binnetoğlu), Medical Faculty, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
İbrahim RencüzoğullarıFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Öterkuş), Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Dönmez), Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Nadir), Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir; and from the Department of Cardiology (Rencüzoğulları, Karabağ), Department of General Surgery (Binnetoğlu), Medical Faculty, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Yavuz KarabağFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Öterkuş), Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Dönmez), Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Nadir), Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir; and from the Department of Cardiology (Rencüzoğulları, Karabağ), Department of General Surgery (Binnetoğlu), Medical Faculty, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Kenan BinnetoğluFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Öterkuş), Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Dönmez), Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul; from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Nadir), Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir; and from the Department of Cardiology (Rencüzoğulları, Karabağ), Department of General Surgery (Binnetoğlu), Medical Faculty, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Turgut Özal University · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effects of low-flow anesthesia on hemodynamic parameters and recovery from anesthesia in obese individuals undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

methodsThis randomized-controlled and prospective study included 44 obese patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy operation. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups as low-flow and high-flow anesthesia. Further, the groups compared in terms of hemodynamic parameters, anesthesia recovery times, operation times, and arterial blood gas parameters.

resultsThe groups were similar with respect to demographic data. Heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure measurements, end-tidal, and CO

conclusionLow-flow anesthesia in laparoscopic obesity surgery seems to be safer compared to high-flow anesthesia in terms of the adequacy of tissue perfusion, depth of anesthesia, and postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesia Recovery PeriodAnestheticsBariatric SurgeryBlood Gas AnalysisFemaleGastrectomyHemodynamicsHumansLaparoscopyMaleObesity, MorbidOperative TimeOxygenProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnestheticsOxygenbariatric/metabolic surgerylow-flow anesthesiamorbid obesity

Identifiers

PMID33632904
PMCPMC7989260
OpenAlexW3131146680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.