Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632813›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Robustness to Noise in the Auditory System: A Distributed and Predictable Property.

S Souffi, C Lorenzi, C Huetz, J-M Edeline

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Noise schemas aid hearing in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S SouffiParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience (Neuro-PSI), Department Integrative and Computational Neuroscience, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR 9197) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Orsay 91405, France.
C LorenziLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR 8248) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-1653
C HuetzParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience (Neuro-PSI), Department Integrative and Computational Neuroscience, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR 9197) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Orsay 91405, France.
J-M EdelineParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience (Neuro-PSI), Department Integrative and Computational Neuroscience, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR 9197) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Orsay 91405, France jean-marc.edeline@u-psud.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0848-2337
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background noise strongly penalizes auditory perception of speech in humans or vocalizations in animals. Despite this, auditory neurons are still able to detect communications sounds against considerable levels of background noise. We collected neuronal recordings in cochlear nucleus (CN), inferior colliculus (IC), auditory thalamus, and primary and secondary auditory cortex in response to vocalizations presented either against a stationary or a chorus noise in anesthetized guinea pigs at three signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs; -10, 0, and 10 dB). We provide evidence that, at each level of the auditory system, five behaviors in noise exist within a continuum, from neurons with high-fidelity representations of the signal, mostly found in IC and thalamus, to neurons with high-fidelity representations of the noise, mostly found in CN for the stationary noise and in similar proportions in each structure for the chorus noise. The two cortical areas displayed fewer robust responses than the IC and thalamus. Furthermore, between 21% and 72% of the neurons (depending on the structure) switch categories from one background noise to another, even if the initial assignment of these neurons to a category was confirmed by a severe bootstrap procedure. Importantly, supervised learning pointed out that assigning a recording to one of the five categories can be predicted up to a maximum of 70% based on both the response to signal alone and noise alone.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexInferior ColliculiAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionGuinea PigsNoiseauditory systemnatural vocalizationsneuronal classificationnoise resistancenoise-type sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID33632813
PMCPMC7986545
OpenAlexW3129929754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.