Observational studyThe European respiratory journal2021
Heterogeneity within and between physician-diagnosed asthma and/or COPD: NOVELTY cohort.
Observational study in The European respiratory journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab Initiation in Treating Asthma and Concurrent Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the US.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Article
- Advancing Precision Approaches to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Review
- Trained immunity in respiratory diseases: Mechanisms of action and intervention strategies.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Dupilumab in Severe Asthma-COPD Overlap: Real-Life Experience on a Case Series.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Biomarker-Defined Endotypes and Clinical Phenotypes of Asthma: A Cluster-Based Analysis of Type-2 Inflammatory Patterns and Their Clinical Correlates.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Article
- Proactive Strategies for Mitigating Cardiopulmonary Risk in COPD.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- Review
- The COURSE trial and beyond: rethinking chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation management with biologics.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- The diagnostic value of bronchodilator response in differentiating asthma, COPD, and ACO in fixed airflow obstruction: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Validity of the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT) in asthma, asthma+COPD and COPD in NOVELTY.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- The Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT™): Evolution From the COPD Assessment Test (CAT™).Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025Article
- The Emerging Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mapping EQ-5D-5L Score From SGRQ in Patients with Asthma and/or COPD in NOVELTY.Pragmatic and observational research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering asthma-related questions.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics of T2-Low and T2-High Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap: Findings From COREA Cohort.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2024Article
- Therapeutic effect of long-acting muscarinic antagonist for treating uncontrolled asthma assessed using impulse oscillometry.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Change is in the air: key questions on the 'Treatable Traits' model for chronic airway diseases in primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Review
- Prevalence, Diagnostic Utility and Associated Characteristics of Bronchodilator Responsiveness.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- The value of bronchodilator response in FEV1 and FeNO for differentiating between chronic respiratory diseases: an observational study.European journal of medical research · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) typically focus on these diagnoses separately, limiting understanding of disease mechanisms and treatment options. NOVELTY is a global, 3-year, prospective observational study of patients with asthma and/or COPD from real-world clinical practice. We investigated heterogeneity and overlap by diagnosis and severity in this cohort.
methodsPatients with physician-assigned asthma, COPD or both (asthma+COPD) were enrolled, and stratified by diagnosis and severity. Baseline characteristics were reported descriptively by physician-assigned diagnosis and/or severity. Factors associated with physician-assessed severity were evaluated using ordinal logistic regression analysis.
resultsOf 11 243 patients, 5940 (52.8%) had physician-assigned asthma, 1396 (12.4%) had asthma+COPD and 3907 (34.8%) had COPD; almost half were from primary care. Symptoms, health-related quality of life and spirometry showed substantial heterogeneity and overlap between asthma, asthma+COPD and COPD, with 23%, 62% and 64% of patients, respectively, having a ratio of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity below the lower limit of normal. Symptoms and exacerbations increased with greater physician-assessed severity and were higher in asthma+COPD. However, 24.3% with mild asthma and 20.4% with mild COPD had experienced ≥1 exacerbation in the past 12 months. Medication records suggested both under-treatment and over-treatment relative to severity. Blood eosinophil counts varied little across diagnosis and severity groups, but blood neutrophil counts increased with severity across all diagnoses.
conclusionThis analysis demonstrates marked heterogeneity within, and overlap between, physician-assigned diagnosis and severity groups in patients with asthma and/or COPD. Current diagnostic and severity classifications in clinical practice poorly differentiate between clinical phenotypes that may have specific risks and treatment implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.