Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632772›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

A double-edged sword-telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: findings from a global mixed-methods study of healthcare providers.

Anna Galle, Aline Semaan, Elise Huysmans, Constance Audet, Anteneh Asefa, Therese Delvaux, Bosede Bukola Afolabi, Alison Marie El Ayadi, Lenka Benova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
33.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna GalleICRH, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium anna.galle@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-5067
Aline SemaanDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Elise HuysmansDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Constance AudetDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Anteneh AsefaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-1848
Therese DelvauxPublic Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Bosede Bukola AfolabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-7567
Alison Marie El AyadiObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2674-4887
Lenka BenovaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEGhent University · BEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Lagos · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid implementation of telemedicine for the provision of maternal and newborn healthcare. The objective of this study was to document the experiences with providing telemedicine for maternal and newborn healthcare during the pandemic among healthcare professionals globally.

methodsThe second round of a global online survey of maternal and newborn health professionals was conducted, disseminated in 11 languages. Data were collected between 5 July and 10 September 2020. The questionnaire included questions regarding background, preparedness and response to COVID-19, and experiences with providing telemedicine. Descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis were used to analyse responses, disaggregated by country income level.

resultsResponses from 1060 maternal and newborn health professionals were analysed. Telemedicine was used by 58% of health professionals and two-fifths of them reported not receiving guidelines on the provision of telemedicine. Key telemedicine practices included online birth preparedness classes, antenatal and postnatal care by video/phone, a COVID-19 helpline and online psychosocial counselling. Challenges reported lack of infrastructure and technological literacy, limited monitoring, financial and language barriers, lack of non-verbal feedback and bonding, and distrust from patients. Telemedicine was considered as an important alternative to in-person consultations. However, health providers emphasised the lower quality of care and risk of increasing the already existing inequalities in access to healthcare.

conclusionsTelemedicine has been applied globally to address disruptions of care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, some crucial aspects of maternal and newborn healthcare seem difficult to deliver by telemedicine. More research regarding the effectiveness, efficacy and quality of telemedicine for maternal healthcare in different contexts is needed before considering long-term adaptations in provision of care away from face-to-face interactions. Clear guidelines for care provision and approaches to minimising socioeconomic and technological inequalities in access to care are urgently needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesTelemedicineCommunication BarriersFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesmaternal health

Identifiers

PMID33632772
PMCPMC7908054
OpenAlexW3130540371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.