Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632765›Full record

ReviewThorax2021

Neutrophils in asthma: the good, the bad and the bacteria.

Helena Crisford, Elizabeth Sapey, Geraint B Rogers, Steven Taylor, Prasad Nagakumar, Ravi Lokwani, Jodie L Simpson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena CrisfordInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-1543
Elizabeth SapeyInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-5482
Geraint B RogersSAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Steven TaylorSAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Prasad NagakumarInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ravi LokwaniFaculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Jodie L SimpsonFaculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia jodie.simpson@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-680X
Flinders University · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21015Medical Research Council MR/L008335/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airway inflammation plays a key role in asthma pathogenesis but is heterogeneous in nature. There has been significant scientific discovery with regard to type 2-driven, eosinophil-dominated asthma, with effective therapies ranging from inhaled corticosteroids to novel biologics. However, studies suggest that approximately 1 in 5 adults with asthma have an increased proportion of neutrophils in their airways. These patients tend to be older, have potentially pathogenic airway bacteria and do not respond well to classical therapies. Currently, there are no specific therapeutic options for these patients, such as neutrophil-targeting biologics.Neutrophils comprise 70% of the total circulatory white cells and play a critical defence role during inflammatory and infective challenges. This makes them a problematic target for therapeutics. Furthermore, neutrophil functions change with age, with reduced microbial killing, increased reactive oxygen species release and reduced production of extracellular traps with advancing age. Therefore, different therapeutic strategies may be required for different age groups of patients.The pathogenesis of neutrophil-dominated airway inflammation in adults with asthma may reflect a counterproductive response to the defective neutrophil microbial killing seen with age, resulting in bystander damage to host airway cells and subsequent mucus hypersecretion and airway remodelling. However, in children with asthma, neutrophils are less associated with adverse features of disease, and it is possible that in children, neutrophils are less pathogenic.In this review, we explore the mechanisms of neutrophil recruitment, changes in cellular function across the life course and the implications this may have for asthma management now and in the future. We also describe the prevalence of neutrophilic asthma globally, with a focus on First Nations people of Australia, New Zealand and North America.

Indexed as

asthmaasthma mechanismsbacterial infectionneutrophil biologypaediatric asthma

Identifiers

PMID33632765
PMCPMC8311087
OpenAlexW3133204522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.