Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632748›Full record

ArticleHospital pediatrics2021

Improving Pediatric Resident Safety Event Reporting Using Quality Improvement Methods.

Monica D Mattes, Hadley S Sauers-Ford, Denise Selleck, Christina Slee, Joanne E Natale, Jennifer L Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica D MattesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California; and monica.mattes@gmail.com.
Hadley S Sauers-FordDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California; and.
Denise SelleckUniversity of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Christina SleeUniversity of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Joanne E NataleDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California; and.
Jennifer L RosenthalDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California; and.

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR001859 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HOLMES, JAMES F. · 2016 to 2025
$10.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001859NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSafety event reporting systems facilitate identification of system-level targets to improve patient safety. Resident physicians report few safety events despite their role as frontline providers and the frequent occurrence of events. The objective of this study is to increase the number of pediatric resident safety event submissions from <1 to 4 submissions per 14-day period within 12 months.

methodsWe conducted an iterative quality improvement process with 39 pediatric residents at a children's hospital. Interventions focused on 4 key drivers: user-friendly event submission process, resident buy-in, nonpunitive safety culture, and data transparency. The primary outcome measure of number of pediatric resident event submissions was analyzed by using statistical process control. Balancing measures included time from submission to feedback, duplicate submissions, and nonevent submissions. As a control, the primary outcome measure was monitored for nonpediatric residents during the same period.

resultsThe mean number of pediatric resident event submissions increased from 0.9 to 5.7 submissions per 14 days. Impactful interventions included a designated space in the resident workroom to list safety events to submit, monthly project updates, and an interresident competition. There were no duplicate submissions or nonevent submissions in the postintervention period. Time to feedback in the postintervention period had both upward and downward shifts, with >8 consecutive points above and below the baseline period's centerline. The control group showed no sustained change in event submissions.

conclusionsOur improvement process was associated with significant increase in pediatric resident safety event submissions without an increase in the number of submissions categorized as duplicates or nonevents.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyQuality ImprovementChildHospitals, PediatricHumansSafety Management

Identifiers

PMID33632748
PMCPMC7898237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.