Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632704›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Effect of reductions in amyloid levels on cognitive change in randomized trials: instrumental variable meta-analysis.

Sarah F Ackley, Scott C Zimmerman, Willa D Brenowitz, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, Audra L Gold, Jennifer J Manly, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Teresa J Filshtein, Melinda C Power, Fanny M Elahi and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 97 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Assessing clinical progression measures in Alzheimer's disease trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies in early Alzheimer's disease: a cochrane review summary and appraisal for the neurological community.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Aberrant Mitochondrial Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease Links Energy Stress with Ferroptosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah F AckleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Scott C ZimmermanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Willa D BrenowitzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eric J Tchetgen TchetgenDepartment of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Audra L GoldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennifer J ManlyTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, G H Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth Rose MayedaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Teresa J Filshtein23&Me, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Melinda C PowerDepartment of Epidemiology, George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington DC, USA.
Fanny M ElahiUCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Adam M BrickmanTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, G H Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
M Maria GlymourDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA maria.glymour@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9644-3081
University of California, San Francisco · USAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative · USMilken Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Miguel Arce · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KENNETH E. COVINSKY, MICHAEL A. STEINMAN · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Translational Epidemiology - Training for Research on Aging and Chronic diseaseT32AG049663 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Mark J Pletcher · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
Novel Designs and Methods to Remove Hidden Confounding Bias in Health SciencesR01AG065276 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Racial Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: The Role of Blood Pressure Throughout AdulthoodR00AG053410 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAYEDA, ELIZABETH ROSE · 2018 to 2020
$710k
Sensory Impairments, Cognitive Decline, and Dementia: What Explains the Association?K01AG062722 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BRENOWITZ, WILLA DOMINO · 2019 to 2023
$652k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG062722NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS R00 AG053410NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065276NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate trials of drugs that target amyloid to determine whether reductions in amyloid levels are likely to improve cognition.

designInstrumental variable meta-analysis.

setting14 randomized controlled trials of drugs for the prevention or treatment of Alzheimer's disease that targeted an amyloid mechanism, identified from ClinicalTrials.gov. POPULATION: Adults enrolled in randomized controlled trials of amyloid targeting drugs. Inclusion criteria for trials vary, but typically include adults aged 50 years or older with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease, and amyloid positivity at baseline.

main outcome measuresAnalyses included trials for which information could be obtained on both change in brain amyloid levels measured with amyloid positron emission tomography and change in at least one cognitive test score reported for each randomization arm.

resultsPooled results from the 14 randomized controlled trials were more precise than estimates from any single trial. The pooled estimate for the effect of reducing amyloid levels by 0.1 standardized uptake value ratio units was an improvement in the mini-mental state examination score of 0.03 (95% confidence interval -0.06 to 0.1) points. This study provides a web application that allows for the re-estimation of the results when new data become available and illustrates the magnitude of the new evidence that would be necessary to achieve a pooled estimate supporting the benefit of reducing amyloid levels.

conclusionsPooled evidence from available trials reporting both reduction in amyloid levels and change in cognition suggests that amyloid reduction strategies do not substantially improve cognition.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesCognitionCognitive DysfunctionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAmyloid beta-Peptides

Identifiers

PMID33632704
PMCPMC7905687
OpenAlexW3130176296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.