Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632484›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2021

Comparison of Management Strategies for Neonates With Symptomatic Tetralogy of Fallot.

Bryan H Goldstein, Christopher J Petit, Athar M Qureshi, Courtney E McCracken, Michael S Kelleman, George T Nicholson, Mark A Law, Jeffery J Meadows, Jeffrey D Zampi, Shabana Shahanavaz and 23 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06081855 (Predictors of Aortic Root Dilatation in Tetralogy of Fallot Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06081855 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Predictors of Aortic Root Dilatation in Tetralogy of Fallot Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled77ConditionsCongenital Heart Disease, Aortic Root Dilatation, Tetralogy of FallotArmsCT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Considerations in Timing of Surgical Repair in Tetralogy of Fallot.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023
    Review
  17. Optimal Surgical Management of Tetralogy of Fallot.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Right Ventricular Strain in Patients With Ductal-Dependent Tetralogy of Fallot.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan H GoldsteinHeart Institute, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: bryan.goldstein@chp.edu.
Christopher J PetitChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Athar M QureshiThe Lillie Frank Abercrombie Section of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Courtney E McCrackenChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael S KellemanChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
George T NicholsonMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville Tennessee, USA.
Mark A LawDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Jeffery J MeadowsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jeffrey D ZampiUniversity of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Shabana ShahanavazThe Heart Center, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Christopher E MascioCardiac Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paul J ChaiChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jennifer C RomanoUniversity of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sarosh P BatlivalaThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Shiraz A MaskatiaBetty Irene Moore Children's Heart Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Ivor B AsztalosCardiac Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alicia M KamshehCardiac Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven J HealanMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville Tennessee, USA.
Justin D SmithUniversity of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
R Allen LigonChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joelle A PettusChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sarina JumaChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
James E B RaulstonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Krissie M HockDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Amy L PajkThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Lindsay F EilersThe Lillie Frank Abercrombie Section of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hala Q KhanThe Lillie Frank Abercrombie Section of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Taylor C MerrittThe Heart Center, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew CanterThe Heart Center, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Stephan JuergensenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Fatuma-Ayaan RinderknechtDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Holly Bauser-HeatonChildren's Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrew C GlatzCardiac Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Emory University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USSt. Louis Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · USMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital · USTexas Children's Hospital · USBaylor College of Medicine · USLucile Packard Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Outcomes in Children Undergoing Cardiac CatheterizationK23HL130420 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI O'BYRNE, MICHAEL L · 2016 to 2020
$907k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL130420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonates with tetralogy of Fallot and symptomatic cyanosis (sTOF) require early intervention.

objectivesThis study sought to perform a balanced multicenter comparison of staged repair (SR) (initial palliation [IP] and subsequent complete repair [CR]) versus primary repair (PR) treatment strategies.

methodsConsecutive neonates with sTOF who underwent IP or PR at ≤30 days of age from 2005 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from the Congenital Cardiac Research Collaborative. The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes included component (IP, CR, PR) and cumulative (SR): hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay; durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, anesthesia, ventilation, and inotrope use; and complication and reintervention rates. Outcomes were compared using propensity score adjustment.

resultsThe cohort consisted of 342 patients who underwent SR (IP: surgical, n = 256; transcatheter, n = 86) and 230 patients who underwent PR. Pre-procedural ventilation, prematurity, DiGeorge syndrome, and pulmonary atresia were more common in the SR group (p ≤0.01). The observed risk of death was not different between the groups (10.2% vs 7.4%; p = 0.25) at median 4.3 years. After adjustment, the hazard of death remained similar between groups (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.49 to 1.38; p = 0.456), but it favored SR during early follow-up (<4 months; p = 0.041). Secondary outcomes favored the SR group in component analysis, whereas they largely favored PR in cumulative analysis. Reintervention risk was higher in the SR group (p = 0.002).

conclusionsIn this multicenter comparison of SR or PR for management of neonates with sTOF, adjusted for patient-related factors, early mortality and neonatal morbidity were lower in the SR group, but cumulative morbidity and reinterventions favored the PR group, findings suggesting potential benefits to each strategy.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesCyanosisHeart TransplantationHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayReoperationRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesTetralogy of FallotTime Factorscongenital heart diseaseneurodevelopmental outcomesoutcomespalliationstaged repair

Identifiers

PMID33632484
PMCPMC8887694
OpenAlexW3129236056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.