Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632280›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Predicting neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with cumulative information; development and internal validation of an artificial neural network algorithm.

Peder Andersson, Jesper Johnsson, Ola Björnsson, Tobias Cronberg, Christian Hassager, Henrik Zetterberg, Pascal Stammet, Johan Undén, Jesper Kjaergaard, Hans Friberg and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The ethical considerations of integrating artificial intelligence into surgery: a review.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Peder AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. peder.andersson@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8261-9613
Jesper JohnssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ola BjörnssonDepartment of Energy Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tobias CronbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Christian HassagerDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy At the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Pascal StammetMedical and Health Directorate, National Fire and Rescue Corps, 1, rue Robert Stumper, 2557, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Johan UndénDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Hallands Hospital Halmstad, Halland, Sweden.
Jesper KjaergaardDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans FribergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy At the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Gisela LiljaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Matt P WiseAdult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Josef DankiewiczDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas Nielsen *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Attila Frigyesi *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEStatistics Sweden · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer´s Association ADSF-21-831376-C, ADSF-21-831381-C, ADSF-21-831377-CAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation 201809-2016862Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation RDAPB-201809-2016615Arbetsmarknadens försäkringsaktiebolag, AFA-Insurance Foundation (SE) 100001European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders JPND2019-466-236Governmental funding of clinical research within the NHS (National Health Service - SE) 2019:YF0053Governmental funding of clinical research within the Swedish NHS (National Health Services) M2010/1837, M2010/1641, 353301Hjärnfonden FO2017-0243Hjärt-Lungfonden 20090275Stig and Ragna Gorthon Foundation (SE) 2019-2589, 2018-1474 and 2017-1390Swedish State Support for Clinical Research ALFGBG-720931The European Research Council 681712The European Union´s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie gran agreement 860197 (MIRIADE)Thelma Zoega Foundation (SE) TZ2017-0062The Swedish Alzheimer Foundation AF-742881The Swedish Research Council 134281, 296161, 286321The Swedish Research Council 2018-02532The Swedish Research Council 2107-00915The Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils (the ALF-agreement) AFLGBG-715986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostication of neurological outcome in patients who remain comatose after cardiac arrest resuscitation is complex. Clinical variables, as well as biomarkers of brain injury, cardiac injury, and systemic inflammation, all yield some prognostic value. We hypothesised that cumulative information obtained during the first three days of intensive care could produce a reliable model for predicting neurological outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using artificial neural network (ANN) with and without biomarkers.

methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of 932 patients from the Target Temperature Management trial. We focused on comatose patients at 24, 48, and 72 h post-cardiac arrest and excluded patients who were awake or deceased at these time points. 80% of the patients were allocated for model development (training set) and 20% for internal validation (test set). To investigate the prognostic potential of different levels of biomarkers (clinically available and research-grade), patients' background information, and intensive care observation and treatment, we created three models for each time point: (1) clinical variables, (2) adding clinically accessible biomarkers, e.g., neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and (3) adding research-grade biomarkers, e.g., neurofilament light (NFL). Patient outcome was the dichotomised Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at six months; a good outcome was defined as CPC 1-2 whilst a poor outcome was defined as CPC 3-5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for all test sets.

resultsAUROC remained below 90% when using only clinical variables throughout the first three days in the ICU. Adding clinically accessible biomarkers such as NSE, AUROC increased from 82 to 94% (p < 0.01). The prognostic accuracy remained excellent from day 1 to day 3 with an AUROC at approximately 95% when adding research-grade biomarkers. The models which included NSE after 72 h and NFL on any of the three days had a low risk of false-positive predictions while retaining a low number of false-negative predictions.

conclusionsIn this exploratory study, ANNs provided good to excellent prognostic accuracy in predicting neurological outcome in comatose patients post OHCA. The models which included NSE after 72 h and NFL on all days showed promising prognostic performance.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveBiomarkersArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networksCardiac arrestCerebral performance categoryCritical careIntensive careMachine learningNeural networksOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPredictionPrognostication

Identifiers

PMID33632280
PMCPMC7905905
OpenAlexW3130832301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.