Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632219›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2021

A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions.

Sarah A Moore, Angela McCleary-Wheeler, Joan R Coates, Natasha Olby, Cheryl London

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah A MooreComparative and Translational Medicine Program, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, USA. Moore.2204@osu.edu.
Angela McCleary-WheelerColumbia College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Joan R CoatesColumbia College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Natasha OlbyNorth Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, USA.
Cheryl LondonCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, Medford, USA.

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
SMART IACUC: A path to harmonized veterinary multi-site trial reviewR21TR003191 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, SARAH A. · 2020 to 2021
$483k
NCATS NIH HHS R21 TR003191NCATS NIH HHS R21TR003191NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a necessary step toward enhancing rigor and reproducibility of veterinary clinical trials conducted on the translational spectrum includes understanding the current state of the field, no broad assessment of existing veterinary clinical trial resources has been previously conducted. Funded by a CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) pilot award, the goal of this project was to conduct an electronic survey of North American Veterinary Colleges regarding practices in veterinary clinical trial review, approval, conduct, and support in order to identify opportunities to leverage existing resources and develop new ones to enhance the impact of veterinary and translational health research.A total of 30 institutions were invited to participate in the survey and the survey response rate was 73 %. The most common source of funding noted for veterinary clinical research was industry (33 %); however, respondents reported that only 5 % (3.7-11.0) of studies were FDA-regulated. Respondents indicated that most studies (80 %); conducted at their institution were single site studies. Study review and approval involved the IACUC either solely, or in combination with a hospital review board, at 95.5 % of institutions. Workforce training related to clinical research best practices was variable across institutions. Opportunities were identified to strengthen infrastructure through harmonization of clinical research review and approval practices. This might naturally lead to expansion of multi-site studies. Based on respondent feedback, future workforce development initiatives might center on training in the specifics of conducting FDA-sponsored research, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), clinical study budget design, grants management, adverse event reporting, study monitoring and use of electronic data capture platforms.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Veterinary as TopicAnimalsOne HealthResearchSchools, VeterinarySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33632219
PMCPMC7905595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.