Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632210›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Improving competence and safety in pain medicine: a practical clinical teaching strategy for students combining simulation and bedside teaching.

Sandra Kurz, Jana Lohse, Holger Buggenhagen, Irene Schmidtmann, Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann, Kristin Engelhard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Use of Video Online Seminars During Clinical Phase of Medical Study from the Perspective of Teachers and Students].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra KurzUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. s.kurz@uni-mainz.de.
Jana LohseUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Holger BuggenhagenUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Irene SchmidtmannUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Rita Laufenberg-FeldmannUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Kristin EngelhardUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is a devastating sensation and has to be treated immediately. Therefore, we developed a training program to improve the knowledge of medical students in the field of pain medicine. In the present study, the applicability and efficacy of this training program was tested.

methodsHalf of the students attended first a training with simulated patients (SP) followed by bedside teaching (Group 1). Group 2 performed the training programs in reverse order. The evaluation based on standardized questionnaires completed by students (self-assessment) and all students took part in two practical examinations after the learning interventions.

resultsThis study included 35 students. The quality of the simulation was evaluated by the students with average grade 1.1 (1 = very good, 6 = very bad). The practical work on the ward with patients was rated with grade 1.4 of 6, the whole course with 1.1. Students of Group A were significantly better in the final examination (grade 1.7 vs. grade 2.2, p < 0.05). To rate the improvement of skills (self-assessment) we used a Likert Scale (1 = very certain, 5 = very uncertain). The following skills were similar in both groups and significantly better after the course: taking responsibility, expert knowledge, empathy, relationship building and communication.

conclusionsTraining with simulated patients in combination with small-group teaching at the bedside with real patients achieves a dramatic increase in student competence. Students prefer learning from the simulation before bedside teaching and propose to include simulation into the curricular teaching of pain medicine.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementPain ManagementAdultCommunicationCurriculumEducation, MedicalEmpathyFemaleGermanyHumansMaleStudents, MedicalBedside teachingCurriculum innovationInteractive medical trainingMedical trainingMulti-professional educationSimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID33632210
PMCPMC7905916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.