Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33632087›Full record

ArticleUrologia2021

How uro-oncology has been affected by COVID-19 emergency? Data from Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta Oncological Network, Italy.

Marco Oderda, Giorgio Calleris, Marco Falcone, Giuseppe Fasolis, Giovanni Muto, Gianluca Oderda, Francesco Porpiglia, Alessandro Volpe, Oscar Bertetto, Paolo Gontero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Impact of COVID-19 on New Kidney Cancer Diagnosis: Stage and Treatment in Northern Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco OderdaDivision of Urology, Molinette Hospital-Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Giorgio CallerisDivision of Urology, Molinette Hospital-Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-1632
Marco FalconeDivision of Urology, Molinette Hospital-Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe FasolisDivision of Urology, Ospedale San Lazzaro, ASL-CN2 Alba-Bra, Alba, Italy.
Giovanni MutoHumanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Gianluca OderdaCredit Suisse AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Francesco PorpigliaDivision of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Alessandro VolpeMaggiore della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Oscar BertettoRete Oncologica del Piemonte e della Valle d'Aosta, Torino, Italy.
Paolo GonteroDivision of Urology, Molinette Hospital-Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically hit all Europe and Northern Italy in particular. The reallocation of medical resources has caused a sharp reduction in the activity of many medical disciplines, including urology. The restricted availability of resources is expected to cause a delay in the treatment of urological cancers and to negatively influence the clinical history of many cancer patients. In this study, we describe COVID-19 impact on uro-oncological management in Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta, estimating its future impact.

methodsWe performed an online survey in 12 urological centers, belonging to the Oncological Network of Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta, to estimate the impact of COVID-19 emergency on their practice. On this basis, we then estimated the medical working capacity needed to absorb all postponed uro-oncological procedures.

resultsMost centers (77%) declared to be "much"/"very much" affected by COVID-19 emergency. If uro-oncological consultations for newly diagnosed cancers were often maintained, follow-up consultations were more than halved or even suspended in around two out of three centers. In-office and day-hospital procedures were generally only mildly reduced, whereas major uro-oncological procedures were more than halved or even suspended in 60% of centers. To clear waiting list backlog, the urological working capacity should dramatically increase in the next months; delays greater than 1 month are expected for more than 50% of uro-oncological procedures.

conclusionsCOVID-19 emergency has dramatically slowed down uro-oncological activity in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta. Ideally, uro-oncological patients should be referred to COVID-19-free tertiary urological centers to ensure a timely management.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilityPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Appointments and SchedulesCOVID-19FemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansItalyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMedical OncologyProcedures and Techniques UtilizationProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmscancercoronavirusCOVIDPiedmonturology

Identifiers

PMID33632087
PMCPMC7917571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.