ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2022
Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Enhancement of Facial Nerve Regeneration Using a Cellulose-Based Nerve Conduit Loaded with Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Human Placental Extract.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative facial analysis using emotrics in patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Peripheral facial palsy: contemporary advances and unresolved debates in management from pathogenic mechanisms to tailored reconstruction.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Facial nerve pathology: emerging strategies for regeneration and functional restoration.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Review
- Motor Function in the Setting of Nerve Allografts: Is This the Future of Facial Nerve Reconstruction?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The potential role of SCF combined with DPCs in facial nerve repair.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- Reanimation Techniques of Peripheral Facial Paralysis: A Comprehensive Review Focusing on Surgical and Bioengineering Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Delivery of neurotrophin-3 by RVG-Lamp2b-modified mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes alleviates facial nerve injury.Human cell · 2024Article
- On the Cranial Nerves.NeuroSci · 2024Review
- Electroacupuncture Promotes Functional Recovery after Facial Nerve Injury in Rats by Regulating Autophagy via GDNF and PI3K/mTOR Signaling Pathway.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2024Article
- Porous Organic Materials in Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Applications for Severed Facial Nerve Injury Repair.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Hypoxic Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Direct Schwann Cells Proliferation, Migration, and Paracrine to Accelerate Facial Nerve Regeneration via circRNA_Nkd2/miR-214-3p/MED19 Axis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Chitosan Tubes Inoculated with Dental Pulp Stem Cells and Stem Cell Factor Enhance Facial Nerve-Vascularized Regeneration in Rabbits.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Biodegradable Nerve Guide with Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Improves Recovery After Facial Nerve Injury in Rats.Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Injury to the facial nerve can occur after different etiologies and range from simple transection of the branches to varying degrees of segmental loss. Management depends on the extent of injury and options include primary repair for simple transections and using autografts, allografts, or conduits for larger gaps. Tissue engineering plays an important role to create artificial materials that are able to mimic the nerve itself without extra morbidity in the patients. The use of neurotrophic factors or stem cells inside the conduits or around the repair site is being increasingly studied to enhance neural recovery to a greater extent. Preclinical studies remain the hallmark for development of these novel approaches and translation into clinical practice. This review will focus on preclinical models of repair after facial nerve injury to help researchers establish an appropriate model to quantify recovery and analyze functional outcomes. Different bioengineered materials, including conduits and nerve grafts, will be discussed based on the experimental animals that were used and the defects introduced. Future directions to extend the applications of processed nerve allografts, bioengineered conduits, and cues inside the conduits to induce neural recovery after facial nerve injury will be highlighted. Impact statement Recovery after facial nerve injury is a complex process, which involves different management options such as primary repair or the use of nerve grafts or conduits. Various tissue-engineered approaches are increasingly studied on preclinical models with limited, but promising, translation to the clinical setting. Herein, preclinical models focusing on different recovery methods after facial nerve injury are comprehensively reviewed based on the experimental animals used. The review provides key insights into current developments and future directions on this highly relevant topic to help researchers further expand the field of tissue engineering and facial nerve recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.