Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33631427›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2021

QAUST: Protein Function Prediction Using Structure Similarity, Protein Interaction, and Functional Motifs.

Fatima Zohra Smaili, Shuye Tian, Ambrish Roy, Meshari Alazmi, Stefan T Arold, Srayanta Mukherjee, P Scott Hefty, Wei Chen, Xin Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning for Protein Function Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. An informatic workflow for the enhanced annotation of excretory/secretory proteins ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fatima Zohra SmailiComputational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Shuye TianDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology of China (SUSTC), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Ambrish RoyDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Meshari AlazmiComputational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia; College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il 55476, Saudi Arabia.
Stefan T AroldBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Srayanta MukherjeeDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
P Scott HeftyDepartment of Molecular Bioscience, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA.
Wei ChenDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology of China (SUSTC), Shenzhen 518055, China. Electronic address: chenw@sustech.edu.cn.
Xin GaoComputational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: xin.gao@kaust.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of available protein sequences in public databases is increasing exponentially. However, a significant percentage of these sequences lack functional annotation, which is essential for the understanding of how biological systems operate. Here, we propose a novel method, Quantitative Annotation of Unknown STructure (QAUST), to infer protein functions, specifically Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers. QAUST uses three sources of information: structure information encoded by global and local structure similarity search, biological network information inferred by protein-protein interaction data, and sequence information extracted from functionally discriminative sequence motifs. These three pieces of information are combined by consensus averaging to make the final prediction. Our approach has been tested on 500 protein targets from the Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) benchmark set. The results show that our method provides accurate functional annotation and outperforms other prediction methods based on sequence similarity search or threading. We further demonstrate that a previously unknown function of human tripartite motif-containing 22 (TRIM22) protein predicted by QAUST can be experimentally validated.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansProteinsEC numberFunctionally discriminative motifGO termProtein function predictionProtein structure similarity

Identifiers

PMID33631427
PMCPMC9403031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.