Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630966›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

CoViD-19, learning from the past: A wavelet and cross-correlation analysis of the epidemic dynamics looking to emergency calls and Twitter trends in Italian Lombardy region.

Bruno Alessandro Rivieccio, Alessandra Micheletti, Manuel Maffeo, Matteo Zignani, Alessandro Comunian, Federica Nicolussi, Silvia Salini, Giancarlo Manzi, Francesco Auxilia, Mauro Giudici and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling Provincial Covid-19 Epidemic Data Using an Adjusted Time-Dependent SIRD Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bruno Alessandro RivieccioDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8625-1721
Alessandra MichelettiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Manuel MaffeoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Matteo ZignaniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-4106
Alessandro ComunianDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-404X
Federica NicolussiDepartment of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods & Data Science Research Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Silvia SaliniDepartment of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods & Data Science Research Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo ManziDepartment of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods & Data Science Research Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco AuxiliaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Mauro GiudiciDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni NaldiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sabrina GaitoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Silvana CastaldiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elia BiganzoliDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health & Data Science Research Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Italy was detected on February the 20th in Lombardy region. Since that date, Lombardy has been the most affected Italian region by the epidemic, and its healthcare system underwent a severe overload during the outbreak. From a public health point of view, therefore, it is fundamental to provide healthcare services with tools that can reveal possible new health system stress periods with a certain time anticipation, which is the main aim of the present study. Moreover, the sequence of law decrees to face the epidemic and the large amount of news generated in the population feelings of anxiety and suspicion. Considering this whole complex context, it is easily understandable how people "overcrowded" social media with messages dealing with the pandemic, and emergency numbers were overwhelmed by the calls. Thus, in order to find potential predictors of possible new health system overloads, we analysed data both from Twitter and emergency services comparing them to the daily infected time series at a regional level. Particularly, we performed a wavelet analysis in the time-frequency plane, to finely discriminate over time the anticipation capability of the considered potential predictors. In addition, a cross-correlation analysis has been performed to find a synthetic indicator of the time delay between the predictor and the infected time series. Our results show that Twitter data are more related to social and political dynamics, while the emergency calls trends can be further evaluated as a powerful tool to potentially forecast new stress periods. Since we analysed aggregated regional data, and taking into account also the huge geographical heterogeneity of the epidemic spread, a future perspective would be to conduct the same analysis on a more local basis.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringSocial MediaCOVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesForecastingHumansItalyPandemics

Identifiers

PMID33630966
PMCPMC7906455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.