Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Conflict processing networks: A directional analysis of stimulus-response compatibilities using MEG.

Jessica Rosenberg, Qunxi Dong, Esther Florin, Praveen Sripad, Frank Boers, Martina Reske, N Jon Shah, Jürgen Dammers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica RosenbergInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Qunxi DongInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Esther FlorinInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Praveen SripadInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-2571
Frank BoersInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Martina ReskeInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5754-4795
N Jon ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Jürgen DammersInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-6592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The suppression of distracting information in order to focus on an actual cognitive goal is a key feature of executive functions. The use of brain imaging methods to investigate the underlying neurobiological brain activations that occur during conflict processing have demonstrated a strong involvement of the fronto-parietal attention network (FPAN). Surprisingly, the directional interconnections, their time courses and activations at different frequency bands remain to be elucidated, and thus, this constitutes the focus of this study. The shared information flow between brain areas of the FPAN is provided for frequency bands ranging from the theta to the lower gamma band (4-40 Hz). We employed an adaptation of the Simon task utilizing Magnetoencephalography (MEG). Granger causality was applied to investigate interconnections between the active brain regions, as well as their directionality. Following stimulus onset, the middle frontal precentral cortex and superior parietal cortex were significantly activated during conflict processing in a time window of between 300 to 600ms. Important differences in causality were found across frequency bands between processing of conflicting stimuli in the left as compared to the right visual hemifield. The exchange of information from and to the FPAN was most prominent in the beta band. Moreover, the anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula represented key areas for conflict monitoring, either by receiving input from other areas of the FPAN or by generating output themselves. This indicates that the salience network is at least partly involved in processing conflict information. The present study provides detailed insights into the underlying neural mechanisms of the FPAN, especially regarding its temporal characteristics and directional interconnections.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCognitionConflict, PsychologicalGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleNerve NetParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33630915
PMCPMC7906351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.