ArticlePloS one2021
Registration of spatio-temporal point clouds of plants for phenotyping.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- A Dataset of Temporally Consistent Instance Annotations for 4D Plant Phenotyping.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Ground Mobile Robots for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review from the Closed-Loop Perspective of Perception, Decision, and Action.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D-OGT: 3D organ growth tracking with minimum segmentation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- A vision language model for generating XML-based organ-level plant architecture representations of cowpea from simulated images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- 3D-NOD: 3D new organ detection in plant growth by a spatiotemporal point cloud deep segmentation framework.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Cotton morphological traits tracking through spatiotemporal registration of terrestrial laser scanning time-series data.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- A Point-Cloud Segmentation Network Based on SqueezeNet and Time Series for Plants.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- How to make sense of 3D representations for plant phenotyping: a compendium of processing and analysis techniques.Plant methods · 2023Review
- 3D data-augmentation methods for semantic segmentation of tomato plant parts.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- PhenoTrack3D: an automatic high-throughput phenotyping pipeline to track maize organs over time.Plant methods · 2022Article
- 3D modeling and reconstruction of plants and trees: A cross-cutting review across computer graphics, vision, and plant phenotyping.Breeding science · 2022Article
- PSegNet: Simultaneous Semantic and Instance Segmentation for Point Clouds of Plants.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant phenotyping is a central task in crop science and plant breeding. It involves measuring plant traits to describe the anatomy and physiology of plants and is used for deriving traits and evaluating plant performance. Traditional methods for phenotyping are often time-consuming operations involving substantial manual labor. The availability of 3D sensor data of plants obtained from laser scanners or modern depth cameras offers the potential to automate several of these phenotyping tasks. This automation can scale up the phenotyping measurements and evaluations that have to be performed to a larger number of plant samples and at a finer spatial and temporal resolution. In this paper, we investigate the problem of registering 3D point clouds of the plants over time and space. This means that we determine correspondences between point clouds of plants taken at different points in time and register them using a new, non-rigid registration approach. This approach has the potential to form the backbone for phenotyping applications aimed at tracking the traits of plants over time. The registration task involves finding data associations between measurements taken at different times while the plants grow and change their appearance, allowing 3D models taken at different points in time to be compared with each other. Registering plants over time is challenging due to its anisotropic growth, changing topology, and non-rigid motion in between the time of the measurements. Thus, we propose a novel approach that first extracts a compact representation of the plant in the form of a skeleton that encodes both topology and semantic information, and then use this skeletal structure to determine correspondences over time and drive the registration process. Through this approach, we can tackle the data association problem for the time-series point cloud data of plants effectively. We tested our approach on different datasets acquired over time and successfully registered the 3D plant point clouds recorded with a laser scanner. We demonstrate that our method allows for developing systems for automated temporal plant-trait analysis by tracking plant traits at an organ level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.