Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630888›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Functional capacities of microbial communities to carry out large scale geochemical processes are maintained during ex situ anaerobic incubation.

R M Wilson, A A Zayed, K B Crossen, B Woodcroft, M M Tfaily, J Emerson, N Raab, S B Hodgkins, B Verbeke, G Tyson and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

R M WilsonDepartment of Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5770-9614
A A ZayedDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
K B CrossenDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
B WoodcroftAustralian Center for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
M M TfailyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-2833
J EmersonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-5566
N RaabDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
S B HodgkinsDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
B VerbekeDepartment of Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.
G TysonAustralian Center for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
P CrillStockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
S SaleskaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
J P ChantonDepartment of Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.
V I RichDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
IsoGenie Project Coordinators
IsoGenie Project Field Team
The Ohio State University · USFlorida State University · USStockholm University · SEThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Arizona · USPlant (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms controlling CO2 and CH4 production in wetlands are central to understanding carbon cycling and greenhouse gas exchange. However, the volatility of these respiration products complicates quantifying their rates of production in the field. Attempts to circumvent the challenges through closed system incubations, from which gases cannot escape, have been used to investigate bulk in situ geochemistry. Efforts towards mapping mechanistic linkages between geochemistry and microbiology have raised concern regarding sampling and incubation-induced perturbations. Microorganisms are impacted by oxygen exposure, increased temperatures and accumulation of metabolic products during handling, storage, and incubation. We probed the extent of these perturbations, and their influence on incubation results, using high-resolution geochemical and microbial gene-based community profiling of anaerobically incubated material from three wetland habitats across a permafrost peatland. We compared the original field samples to the material anaerobically incubated over 50 days. Bulk geochemistry and phylum-level microbiota in incubations largely reflected field observations, but divergence between field and incubations occurred in both geochemistry and lineage-level microbial composition when examined at closer resolution. Despite the changes in representative lineages over time, inferred metabolic function with regards to carbon cycling largely reproduced field results suggesting functional consistency. Habitat differences among the source materials remained the largest driver of variation in geochemical and microbial differences among the samples in both incubations and field results. While incubations may have limited usefulness for identifying specific mechanisms, they remain a viable tool for probing bulk-scale questions related to anaerobic C cycling, including CO2 and CH4 dynamics.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaWetlandsAnaerobiosisCarbon DioxideMethaneCarbon DioxideMethane

Identifiers

PMID33630888
PMCPMC7906461
OpenAlexW3129892326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.