Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630885›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

From e-voucher to genomic data: Preserving archive specimens as demonstrated with medically important mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and kissing bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae).

Silvia Andrade Justi, John Soghigian, David B Pecor, Laura Caicedo-Quiroga, Wiriya Rutvisuttinunt, Tao Li, Lori Stevens, Patricia L Dorn, Brian Wiegmann, Yvonne-Marie Linton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pathogen prospecting of museums: Reconstructing malaria epidemiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia Andrade JustiWalter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Smithsonian Institution Museum Support Center, Suitland, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-8350
John SoghigianDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4469-2072
David B PecorWalter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Smithsonian Institution Museum Support Center, Suitland, MD, United States of America.
Laura Caicedo-QuirogaWalter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Smithsonian Institution Museum Support Center, Suitland, MD, United States of America.
Wiriya RutvisuttinuntViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Tao LiViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Lori StevensDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Patricia L DornDepartment of Biological Sciences, Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-7008
Brian WiegmannDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Yvonne-Marie LintonWalter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Smithsonian Institution Museum Support Center, Suitland, MD, United States of America.

Funding

Chagas disease transmission: Genomic studies of the kissing bug Triatoma infestans to enhance control strategies for a neglected tropical diseaseR03AI126268 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI CAHAN, SARA, STEVENS, LORI · 2016 to 2017
$155k
NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI126268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific collections such as the U.S. National Museum (USNM) are critical to filling knowledge gaps in molecular systematics studies. The global taxonomic impediment has resulted in a reduction of expert taxonomists generating new collections of rare or understudied taxa and these large historic collections may be the only reliable source of material for some taxa. Integrated systematics studies using both morphological examinations and DNA sequencing are often required for resolving many taxonomic issues but as DNA methods often require partial or complete destruction of a sample, there are many factors to consider before implementing destructive sampling of specimens within scientific collections. We present a methodology for the use of archive specimens that includes two crucial phases: 1) thoroughly documenting specimens destined for destructive sampling-a process called electronic vouchering, and 2) the pipeline used for whole genome sequencing of archived specimens, from extraction of genomic DNA to assembly of putative genomes with basic annotation. The process is presented for eleven specimens from two different insect subfamilies of medical importance to humans: Anophelinae (Diptera: Culicidae)-mosquitoes and Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)-kissing bugs. Assembly of whole mitochondrial genome sequences of all 11 specimens along with the results of an ortholog search and BLAST against the NCBI nucleotide database are also presented.

Indexed as

AnimalsCulicidaeDNAGenomicsHumansPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNATriatomaTriatominaeDNA

Identifiers

PMID33630885
PMCPMC7906454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.