Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630869›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A performance comparison of supervised machine learning models for Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis.

Furqan Rustam, Madiha Khalid, Waqar Aslam, Vaibhav Rupapara, Arif Mehmood, Gyu Sang Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. COVID-19 Public Opinion: A Twitter Healthcare Data Processing Using Machine Learning Methodologies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Furqan RustamDepartment of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8403-1047
Madiha KhalidDepartment of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Waqar AslamDepartment of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8780-0240
Vaibhav RupaparaSchool of Computing and Information Sciences Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-4521
Arif MehmoodDepartment of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5822-4005
Gyu Sang ChoiDepartment of Information & Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of Covid-19 has resulted in worldwide health concerns. Social media is increasingly used to share news and opinions about it. A realistic assessment of the situation is necessary to utilize resources optimally and appropriately. In this research, we perform Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis using a supervised machine learning approach. Identification of Covid-19 sentiments from tweets would allow informed decisions for better handling the current pandemic situation. The used dataset is extracted from Twitter using IDs as provided by the IEEE data port. Tweets are extracted by an in-house built crawler that uses the Tweepy library. The dataset is cleaned using the preprocessing techniques and sentiments are extracted using the TextBlob library. The contribution of this work is the performance evaluation of various machine learning classifiers using our proposed feature set. This set is formed by concatenating the bag-of-words and the term frequency-inverse document frequency. Tweets are classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Performance of classifiers is evaluated on the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. For completeness, further investigation is made on the dataset using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture of the deep learning model. The results show that Extra Trees Classifiers outperform all other models by achieving a 0.93 accuracy score using our proposed concatenated features set. The LSTM achieves low accuracy as compared to machine learning classifiers. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed feature set, the results are compared with the Vader sentiment analysis technique based on the GloVe feature extraction approach.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaSupervised Machine LearningDeep LearningHumansNatural Language ProcessingPandemicsPublic Opinion

Identifiers

PMID33630869
PMCPMC7906356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.