Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630833›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

A systematic literature review of schistosomiasis in urban and peri-urban settings.

Katharina Klohe, Benjamin G Koudou, Alan Fenwick, Fiona Fleming, Amadou Garba, Anouk Gouvras, Emma M Harding-Esch, Stefanie Knopp, David Molyneux, Susan D'Souza and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence, Intensity, and Risk Factors ofJournal of parasitology research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Katharina KloheGlobal Schistosomiasis Alliance, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7922-7424
Benjamin G KoudouCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Alan FenwickImperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona FlemingSchistosomiasis Control Initiative Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Amadou GarbaWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anouk GouvrasGlobal Schistosomiasis Alliance, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-4309
Emma M Harding-EschClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1432-8109
Stefanie KnoppSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5707-7963
David MolyneuxDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Susan D'SouzaSightsavers, Haywards Heath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3035-6679
Jürg UtzingerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Penelope VounatsouSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Johannes WaltzGlobal Schistosomiasis Alliance, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-0877
Yaobi ZhangHelen Keller International, Regional Office for Africa, Dakar, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0002-7370-9171
David RollinsonGlobal Schistosomiasis Alliance, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-1716
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHHelen Keller International · USImperial College London · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSightsavers · GBSwiss Centre for Scientific Research · CIWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchistosomiasis is a parasitic disease caused by trematode worms of the genus Schistosoma and belongs to the neglected tropical diseases. The disease has been reported in 78 countries, with around 290.8 million people in need of treatment in 2018. Schistosomiasis is predominantly considered a rural disease with a subsequent focus of research and control activities in rural settings. Over the past decades, occurrence and even expansion of schistosomiasis foci in peri-urban and urban settings have increasingly been observed. Rural-urban migration in low- and middle-income countries and subsequent rapid and unplanned urbanization are thought to explain these observations. Fifty-five percent (55%) of the world population is already estimated to live in urban areas, with a projected increase to 68% by 2050. In light of rapid urbanization and the efforts to control morbidity and ultimately achieve elimination of schistosomiasis, it is important to deepen our understanding of the occurrence, prevalence, and transmission of schistosomiasis in urban and peri-urban settings. A systematic literature review looking at urban and peri-urban schistosomiasis was therefore carried out as a first step to address the research and mapping gap. METHODOLOGY: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic computer-aided literature review was carried out using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the World Health Organization Database in November 2019, which was updated in March 2020. Only papers for which at least the abstract was available in English were used. Relevant publications were screened, duplicates were removed, guidelines for eligibility were applied, and eligible studies were reviewed. Studies looking at human Schistosoma infections, prevalence, and intensity of infection in urban and peri-urban settings were included as well as those focusing on the intermediate host snails. PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 248 publications met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies confirm that schistosomiasis is prevalent in peri-urban and urban areas in the countries assessed. Earlier studies report higher prevalence levels in urban settings compared to data extracted from more recent publications, yet the challenge of migration, rapid uncontrolled urbanization, and resulting poor living conditions highlight the potential for continuous or even newly established transmission to take place.

conclusionsThe review indicates that schistosomiasis has long existed in urban and peri-urban areas and remains a public health problem. There is, however, a challenge of comparability of settings due to the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes urban and peri-urban. There is a pressing need for improved monitoring of schistosomiasis in urban communities and consideration of treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansSchistosomaSchistosomiasisSnailsSuburban PopulationUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID33630833
PMCPMC7906408
OpenAlexW3131771021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.