Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630732›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2021

Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT.

Nigel J Hall, Frances C Sherratt, Simon Eaton, Isabel Reading, Erin Walker, Maria Chorozoglou, Lucy Beasant, Wendy Wood, Michael Stanton, Harriet J Corbett and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing micro- vs macro-costing approaches for treating appendicitis in children with appendicectomy or non-operatively.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Nigel J HallFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8570-9374
Frances C SherrattDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-9305
Simon EatonUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0892-9204
Isabel ReadingPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1457-6532
Erin WalkerGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-2547
Maria ChorozoglouSouthampton Health Technology Assessment Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-4653
Lucy BeasantCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-5644
Wendy WoodNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Research Design Service South Central, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-4455
Michael StantonDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1130-9778
Harriet J CorbettDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-1457
Dean RexDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9040-1662
Natalie HutchingsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9381-2750
Elizabeth DixonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-9533
Simon GristPatient and public involvement representative.ORCID 0000-0001-7529-5665
William Van't HoffGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-5530
Esther CrawleyCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2521-0747
Jane BlazebyCentre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-3330
Bridget YoungDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-9901
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/192/90Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough non-operative treatment is known to be effective for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children, randomised trial data comparing important outcomes of non-operative treatment with those of appendicectomy are lacking.

objectivesThe objectives were to ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway with appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

designThis was a mixed-methods study, which included a feasibility randomised controlled trial, embedded and parallel qualitative and survey studies, a parallel health economic feasibility study and the development of a core outcome set.

settingThis study was set in three specialist NHS paediatric surgical units in England.

participantsChildren (aged 4-15 years) clinically diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis participated in the feasibility randomised controlled trial. Children, their families, recruiting clinicians and other health-care professionals involved in caring for children with appendicitis took part in the qualitative study. UK specialist paediatric surgeons took part in the survey. Specialist paediatric surgeons, adult general surgeons who treat children, and children and young people who previously had appendicitis, along with their families, took part in the development of the core outcome set.

interventionsParticipants in the feasibility randomised controlled trial were randomised to a non-operative treatment pathway (broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation) or appendicectomy.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited to the feasibility trial. DATA SOURCES: Data were sourced from NHS case notes, questionnaire responses, transcribed audio-recordings of recruitment discussions and qualitative interviews.

resultsOverall, 50% (95% confidence interval 40% to 59%) of 115 eligible patients approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. There was high acceptance of randomisation and good adherence to trial procedures and follow-up (follow-up rates of 89%, 85% and 85% at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, respectively). More participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated. Qualitative work enabled us to communicate about the trial effectively with patients and families, to design and deliver bespoke training to optimise recruitment and to understand how to optimise the design and delivery of a future trial. The health economic study indicated that the main cost drivers are the ward stay cost and the cost of the operation; it has also informed quality-of-life assessment methods for future work. A core outcome set for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people was developed, containing 14 outcomes. There is adequate surgeon interest to justify proceeding to an effectiveness trial, with 51% of those surveyed expressing a willingness to recruit with an unchanged trial protocol. LIMITATIONS: Because the feasibility randomised controlled trial was performed in only three centres, successful recruitment across a larger number of sites cannot be guaranteed. However, the qualitative work has informed a bespoke training package to facilitate this. Although survey results suggest adequate clinician interest to make a larger trial possible, actual participation may differ, and equipoise may have changed over time.

conclusionsA future effectiveness trial is feasible, following limited additional preparation, to establish appropriate outcome measures and case identification. It is recommended to include a limited package of qualitative work to optimise recruitment, in particular at new centres. FUTURE WORK: Prior to proceeding to an effectiveness trial, there is a need to develop a robust method for distinguishing children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from those with more advanced appendicitis, and to reach agreement on a primary outcome measure and effect size that is acceptable to all stakeholder groups involved.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN15830435.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

AppendicitisAdolescentAdultChildConservative TreatmentCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAPPENDICITISCORE OUTCOME SETFEASIBILITY TRIALNON-OPERATIVE TREATMENTPATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENTQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID33630732
PMCPMC7958256
OpenAlexW3130473830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.