Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630675›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2021

Hemodynamics of post-exercise vs. post hot water immersion recovery.

Michael A Francisco, Cameron Colbert, Emily A Larson, Dylan C Sieck, John R Halliwill, Christopher T Minson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to different passive heat therapy modalities.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Brachial and carotid hemodynamic response to hot water immersion in men and women.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A FranciscoDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, United States.
Cameron ColbertDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, United States.
Emily A LarsonDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, United States.
Dylan C SieckDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, United States.
John R HalliwillDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, United States.
Christopher T MinsonDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, United States.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Heat Therapy versus Exercise Training in HypertensionR01HL144128 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI HALLIWILL, JOHN R., MINSON, CHRISTOPHER TODD · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) HL144128Kenneth and Kenda Singer Endowed ProfessorshipNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144128University of Oregon Vice President of Research Undergraduate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to compare the hemodynamics of the recovery periods following exercise versus hot water immersion. Twelve subjects (6 F, 22.7 ± 0.8 y; BMI: 21.8 ± 2.1 kg·m

Indexed as

arterial pressurehyperthermiapost exercise hypotensionsaunashear stress

Identifiers

PMID33630675
PMCPMC8354820
OpenAlexW3131251476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.