Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630645›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2022

E-liquid purchase as a function of workplace restriction in the experimental tobacco marketplace.

Roberta Freitas-Lemos, Jeffrey S Stein, Derek A Pope, Jeremiah Brown, Marc Feinstein, Kelsey M Stamborski, Allison N Tegge, Bryan W Heckman, Warren K Bickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Selective Reduction of Socioeconomic Disparities in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: Effects of Cigarette and E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  4. Behavioral economic cigarette demand among individuals who smoke with and without obesity.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roberta Freitas-LemosFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.ORCID 0000-0003-3651-0806
Jeffrey S SteinFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.ORCID 0000-0001-5251-3447
Derek A PopeFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.ORCID 0000-0002-7667-463X
Jeremiah BrownFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.ORCID 0000-0001-9044-8586
Marc FeinsteinFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.ORCID 0000-0001-6217-5533
Kelsey M StamborskiFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.
Allison N TeggeFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.
Bryan W HeckmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.ORCID 0000-0003-4148-2467
Warren K BickelFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
National Institutes of Health; National Cancer InstituteNCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarette use is prohibited in most smoke-free environments. The effect of this policy on tobacco consumption could be examined using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM). The ETM allows observation of policy on smokers' purchasing behavior under conditions that simulate "real-world" circumstances. A within-subject design was used to evaluate the effect of workplace policy (Vaping Allowed vs. Not Allowed) and nicotine concentration (24 mg/mL vs. 0 mg/mL) on tobacco product consumption. Participants (n = 31) completed one sampling and two ETM/workplace sessions per week for 2 weeks. During the sampling session, participants were given an e-cigarette with a 2-day supply of a commercially available e-liquid of their preferred flavor. Before purchasing, participants were informed whether e-cigarette use was permitted. During the four ETM sessions, participants purchased for the following 24 hr, including the 4-hr work shift that started immediately after buying products in the ETM. The workplace session consisted of data entry tasks in a mock office environment. Participants could use any purchased tobacco products during two 15-min breaks. Condition order was counterbalanced. The results show that permitting E-cigarette use in the workplace increased e-liquid purchase on average, but nicotine concentration had no effect on e-liquid demand. Cigarette demand was unaltered across conditions. The present study suggests that allowing e-cigarette use in the workplace would increase demand for e-liquid regardless of nicotine strength. However, it would not change conventional cigarette demand. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsHumansNicotineWorkplaceNicotine

Identifiers

PMID33630645
PMCPMC8384943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.