Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630411›Full record

ArticleCancer communications (London, England)2021

Co-occurrence of germline pathogenic variants for different hereditary cancer syndromes in patients with Lynch syndrome.

Rosario Ferrer-Avargues, María Isabel Castillejo, Estela Dámaso, Virginia Díez-Obrero, Noemí Garrigos, Tatiana Molina, Alan Codoñer-Alejos, Ángel Segura, Ana Beatriz Sánchez-Heras, Adela Castillejo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer communications (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coexisting germline variants ofInternational cancer conference journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Case Report: Clinical impact ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosario Ferrer-AvarguesFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
María Isabel CastillejoFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
Estela DámasoFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
Virginia Díez-ObreroFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
Noemí GarrigosDepartment of Molecular Biopathology, Immunological Center of Alicante, San Juan-Alicante, 03550, Spain.
Tatiana MolinaDepartment of Molecular Biopathology, Immunological Center of Alicante, San Juan-Alicante, 03550, Spain.
Alan Codoñer-AlejosFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
Ángel SeguraMedical Oncology Department, Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit. La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, 46026, Spain.
Ana Beatriz Sánchez-HerasFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
Adela CastillejoFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.
José Luis SotoFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), FISABIO- Elche Health Department, Elche, 032303, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0234-9188
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESUniversity of Alicante · ESCounseling Center · USHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition characterized by a high risk of colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and other neoplasia associated with germline alterations in DNA mismatch repair genes. The classical genetic diagnostic strategy for LS consists of the Sanger sequencing of genes associated with the suspected syndrome. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables the simultaneous sequencing of a large number of hereditary cancer genes. Here, we aimed to study whether other germline pathogenic variants of hereditary cancer genes are present in patients with LS.

methodsA cohort of 84 probands with a previous genetic diagnosis of LS by Sanger sequencing was reanalyzed using NGS via a commercial panel of 94 hereditary cancer genes by hybrid capture. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria were used to classify the clinical significance of the variants. The findings of NGS were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. When possible, genetic analyses of the new findings in the proband's relatives were also performed by Sanger sequencing.

resultsWe identified five families (6%), out of 84, with at least two germline pathogenic variants conferring to high or moderate risk in different dominant cancer-predisposing genes: [MLH1-BRCA2-NBN], [MLH1-BRCA1], [MSH2-ATM], [MSH6-NF1], and [MLH1-FANCA]. Interestingly, only one out of these five families exhibited a clinical phenotype associated with the new pathogenic variants. The family with three pathogenic variants of the [MLH1-BRCA2-NBN] genes showed a high aggregation of tumors associated with LS and breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

conclusionsOur results showed that the co-occurrence of more than one pathogenic variant in cancer-predisposing genes was remarkable among cases of LS. In most cases, no clinicial manifestations were associated with the secondary pathogenic variants. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate their clinical impact. Reanalysis of LS families should be considered only in families with mixed clinical phenotypes.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleGenetic TestingGerm CellsGerm-Line MutationHumanscancer panelhereditary cancerlynch syndromemoderate penetrance genesmultilocus inherited neoplasia alleles syndromenext-generation sequencingsecondary findings

Identifiers

PMID33630411
PMCPMC7968885
OpenAlexW3133288939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.