Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630259›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection.

João Tito Borges, Liane Yuri Kondo Nakada, Milena Guedes Maniero, José Roberto Guimarães

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Shotgun metagenomics on indoor air for surveillance of respiratory, enteric, and skin viruses in a Belgian daycare setting, January to December 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Occupational exposure monitoring of airborne respiratory viruses in outpatient medical clinics.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms, Techniques and Devices of Airborne Virus Detection: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

João Tito BorgesDepartment of Infrastructure and Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, University of Campinas (InfrA, FEC, UNICAMP), Rua Saturnino de Brito, 224, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083889, Brazil.
Liane Yuri Kondo NakadaDepartment of Infrastructure and Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, University of Campinas (InfrA, FEC, UNICAMP), Rua Saturnino de Brito, 224, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083889, Brazil.
Milena Guedes ManieroDepartment of Infrastructure and Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, University of Campinas (InfrA, FEC, UNICAMP), Rua Saturnino de Brito, 224, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083889, Brazil.
José Roberto GuimarãesDepartment of Infrastructure and Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, University of Campinas (InfrA, FEC, UNICAMP), Rua Saturnino de Brito, 224, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083889, Brazil. jorober@unicamp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-6573
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods to detect viruses, especially SARS-CoV-2. The review was conducted using the following online databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, and PubMed, and the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR" to combine the following keywords: air sampler, coronavirus, COVID-19, indoor, and SARS-CoV-2. This review included 25 published papers reporting sampling and detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Most of the papers focused on sampling and analysis of viruses in aerosols present in contaminated areas and potential transmission to adjacent areas. Negative results were found in 10 studies, while 15 papers showed positive results in at least one sample. Overall, papers report several sampling devices and methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection, using different approaches for distance, height from the floor, flow rates, and sampled air volumes. Regarding the efficacy of each mechanism as measured by the percentage of investigations with positive samples, the literature review indicates that solid impactors are more effective than liquid impactors, or filters, and the combination of various methods may be recommended. As a final remark, determining the sampling method is not a trivial task, as the samplers and the environment influence the presence and viability of viruses in the samples, and thus a case-by-case assessment is required for the selection of sampling systems.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorCOVID-19AerosolsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AerosolsBiological air samplerCOVID-19CycloneImpactorImpinger

Identifiers

PMID33630259
PMCPMC7905194
OpenAlexW3130501066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.