ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2021
Different distribution patterns of microorganisms between aquaculture pond sediment and water.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- L-Glutamine Plus L-Glutamic Acid Enhances Antioxidant Status and Ammonia Toxicity Resilience, Upregulates Interleukin IL-10 Gene, and Improves Gut Microbiota and Survival in Juvenile Nile Tilapia.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2026Article
- Research on Prophages in Aquaculture from the Perspective of Paradigm Borrowing: Advances in Pathogen Virulence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Environmental Regulation.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Integrating Water Column and Sediment eDNA Metabarcoding Reveals Seasonal Turnover and Habitat-Specific Differentiation of Fish Communities in a Subtropical Coastal Bay.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Impacts of Probiotics on Microbial Populations in Aquaculture Systems.Microbial ecology · 2026Review
- Lotus-fish co-culture reshapes pond microbiota and improves ecological stability relative to fish monoculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Varying Responses to Heat Stress and Salinization Between Benthic and Pelagic Riverine Microbial Communities.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Carbon and Nutrient Limitations of Microbial Metabolism in Xingkai Lake, China: Abiotic and Biotic Drivers.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
- Article
- Metagenomic Insight into the Effect of Probiotics on Nitrogen Cycle in theMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- A review: Marine aquaculture impacts marine microbial communities.AIMS microbiology · 2024Review
- Antibiotic resistance gene-free probiont administration to tilapia for growth performance andVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Review
- Red mark syndrome: Is the aquaculture water microbiome a keystone for understanding the disease aetiology?Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Viable bacterial counts of the Pangasius catfish (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquatic microorganisms in the sediment and water column are closely related; however, their distribution patterns between these two habitats still remain largely unknown. In this study, we compared sediment and water microeukaryotic and bacterial microorganisms in aquaculture ponds from different areas in China, and analyzed the influencing environmental factors as well as the inter-taxa relationships. We found that bacteria were significantly more abundant than fungi in both sediment and water, and the bacterial richness and diversity in sediment were higher than in water in all the sampling areas, but no significant differences were found between the two habitats for microeukaryotes. Bacterial taxa could be clearly separated through cluster analysis between the sediment and water, while eukaryotic taxa at all classification levels could not. Spirochaetea, Deltaproteobacteria, Nitrospirae, Ignavibacteriae, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, and Lentimicrobiaceae were more abundantly distributed in sediment, while Betaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacter, Cyanobacteria, Roseiflexaceae, Dinghuibacter, Cryomorphaceae, and Actinobacteria were more abundant in water samples. For eukaryotes, only Cryptomonadales were found to be distributed differently between the two habitats. Microorganisms in sediment were mainly correlated with enzymes related to organic matter decomposition, while water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and nutrient levels all showed significant correlation with the microbial communities in pond water. Intensive interspecific relationships were also found among eukaryotes and bacteria. Together, our results indicated that eukaryotic microorganisms are distributed less differently between sediment and water in aquaculture ponds compared to bacteria. This study provides valuable data for evaluating microbial distributions in aquatic environments, which may also be of practical use in aquaculture pond management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33630250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.