Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630233›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2021

An Update on the Clinical Evaluation of Antibody-Based Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Sangeetha Venugopal, Naval Daver, Farhad Ravandi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application of nanoparticles in antibody drug delivery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sangeetha VenugopalDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. fravandi@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe advent of several targeted agents has revolutionized the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in recent times; however, majority of patients are still not cured. In the ongoing quest for rationally targeted treatment strategies in AML, scientific endeavors have focused on identifying new antigen targets on the leukemic cells for therapeutic exploitation including strategies to directly deliver toxins into the leukemic blasts as well as strategies that harness host immunity to favorably impact clinical outcomes. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a CD33 directed antibody-drug conjugate, has provided the proof of concept for the potential efficacy of monoclonal antibody-based therapies in AML. This article provides an overview of immunologically relevant antigen targets expressed on the leukemic cells and synopsizes the clinical results evaluating targeted antibody-based therapeutic approach in AML. RECENT

findingsAML blasts and leukemic stem cells express several antigens, including CD33, CD47, CD70, CD123, and CLEC12A. The past several years have seen the burgeoning of cell-specific immunotherapy concepts, including checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-toxin conjugates, and bispecific antibodies in the treatment of AML. The first-in-class anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab and anti-CD70 antibody cusatuzumab in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine, in newly diagnosed AML, and flotetuzumab, a bispecific DART® (dual-affinity retargeting) antibody to CD3ε and CD123 as salvage option in relapsed/refractory AML appear promising. The development of antibody-based immunotherapeutic approach in AML has been encouraging. Ongoing research will define the choice of an appropriate complementary therapeutic agent in antibody-based combination therapy, and whether one or more than one antigen should be simultaneously targeted. Further studies will likely refine the role of antibody-based therapy in post hematopoietic cell transplant setting.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalGemtuzumabHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoconjugatesLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalGemtuzumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoconjugatesAcute myeloid leukemiaCD123CD33CD47CD70

Identifiers

PMID33630233
OpenAlexW3130836763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.