ArticleClinical oral investigations2021
Regeneration of pulp-dentin complex using human stem cells of the apical papilla: in vivo interaction with two bioactive materials.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Development of a Nano-Hybrid Composite Using Bovine Hydroxyapatite and Montmorillonite for Endodontic Applications-An In Vitro Study.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- In Vitro Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling of Cultured Stem Cells From Apical Papilla and Dental Pulp Stem Cells: Unveiling Cellular Heterogeneity.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Outcome evaluation of regenerative endodontic procedures using platelet derivatives: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal models.Odontology · 2026Review
- Article
- Immunomodulatory and dentinogenic potential of surface-engineered hesperetin-functionalized composite scaffolds for pulp-dentin regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Histopathologic responses of the dental pulp to an experimental calcium aluminate-calcium silicate based capping material in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FBXO5 alleviates apical periodontitis by facilitating TP53 protein degradation.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Coronal tubule penetration of different calcium silicate materials in regenerative endodontics: a comparative study with a novel imaging method.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Antibiofilm activity of three-dimensional bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds containing antimicrobial agents.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study on the Influence of Zirconia and Titanium Nanoparticles on the Functionality of Osteocytes In Vitro.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of laser and ultrasonic irrigation techniques for smear layer removal in endodontics.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential of stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAPs) in regenerative medicine: advantages, applications, challenges and opportunities.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Modulation of primary human apical papilla stem cells: Influence of Enterococcus faecalis, oxygen levels, and calcium silicate-based cements.European journal of oral sciences · 2025Article
- Optimizing methods for regenerative endodontics.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Management of External Root Resorption following Replantation After Accidental Tooth Extraction Using Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: A Case Report.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Influence of photobiomodulation therapy on regenerative potential of non-vital mature permanent teeth in healthy canine dogs.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Article
- Injectable thermosensitive antibiotic-laden chitosan hydrogel for regenerative endodontics.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Simvastatin modulates osteogenic differentiation in Stem Cells isolated from Apical Papilla.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the regenerative properties of human stem cells of the apical papilla (SCAPs) embedded in a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) scaffold, when implanted in vivo using an organotypic model composed of human root segments, with or without the presence of the bioactive cements - ProRoot MTA or Biodentine. MATERIAL AND
methodsSCAPs were isolated from third molars with incomplete rhizogenesis and expanded and characterized in vitro using stem cell and surface markers. The pluripotency of these cells was also assessed using adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation protocols. SCAPs together with a scaffold of PRP were added to the root segment lumen and the organotypic model implanted on the dorsal region of immunodeficient rats for a period of 4 months.
resultsPresence of SCAPs induced de novo formation of dentin-like and pulp-like tissue. A barrier of either ProRoot MTA or Biodentine did not significantly affect the fraction of sections from roots segments observed to contain deposition of hard material (P > 0.05). However, the area of newly deposited dentin was significantly greater in segments containing a barrier of Biodentine compared with ProRoot MTA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SCAPs offer a viable alternative to other dental stem cells (DSCs) in their regenerative properties when enclosed in the microenvironment of human tooth roots. The present study also suggests that the presence of bioactive materials does not hinder or impede the formation of new hard tissues, but the presence of Biodentine may promote greater mineralized tissue deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.