Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630147›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2022

Attitudes and perceived barriers toward store-and-forward teledermatology among primary care providers of the rural Mississippi.

Summer Morrissette, Ross L Pearlman, Margaret Kovar, William T Sisson, Robert T Brodell, Vinayak K Nahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Summer MorrissetteDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, L216, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
Ross L PearlmanDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, L216, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
Margaret KovarDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, L216, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
William T SissonDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, L216, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
Robert T BrodellDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, L216, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
Vinayak K NaharDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, L216, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA. naharvinayak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6771-1662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth expands the capacity to care for patients in rural and underserved settings. Store-and-forward teledermatology is a simple and effective approach which enables remote dermatological diagnosis and treatment. Implementing store-and-forward technology in rural Mississippi has the potential to expand access to dermatology services at locations, where an in-person dermatologist is not available including: emergency rooms, urgent care centers, and primary care practices. A survey study was conducted to assess perceived obstacles and attitudes about store-and-forward teledermatology among primary care providers in Mississippi's rural areas. Most providers are very interested in the telehealth program and the opportunities it provides them to best treat their patients. Key barriers to engagement in teledermatology were (1) primary non-adherence: this is rooted in misconception about teledermatology, the investment in time required to master the technology and establish digital links between primary care provider and consultant; and, (2) secondary non-adherence: this is related to the time required to submit a teledermatology consult which disrupts busy offices. Emphasizing the benefits of teledermatology to primary care physicians and simplification of the teledermatology consult submission process may increase the use of teledermatology in rural Mississippi and serve as a model for other academic teledermatology programs throughout the United States.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDermatologyHealth Services AccessibilityRural PopulationHumansMississippiPrimary Health CareRemote ConsultationSkin DiseasesTelemedicineAttitudesBarriersPrimary care providersRuralTeledermatology

Identifiers

PMID33630147
PMCPMC7905757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.