Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630140›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021

Long-term safety and efficacy of opicapone in Japanese Parkinson's patients with motor fluctuations.

Atsushi Takeda, Ryosuke Takahashi, Yoshio Tsuboi, Masahiro Nomoto, Tetsuya Maeda, Akihisa Nishimura, Kazuo Yoshida, Nobutaka Hattori

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi TakedaNational Hospital Organization, Sendai-Nishitaga Hospital, 2-11-11 Kagitorihoncho, Taihaku-ku, Sendai, 982-8555, Japan. takeda.atsushi.nc@mail.hosp.go.jp.
Ryosuke TakahashiDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshio TsuboiDepartment of Neurology, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masahiro NomotoDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Pharmacology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Tetsuya MaedaDivision of Neurology and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
Akihisa NishimuraDepartment of Clinical Development, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Kazuo YoshidaDepartment of Clinical Development, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Nobutaka HattoriDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ono Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPFukuoka University Hospital · JPIwate Medical University · JPJuntendo University · JPKyoto University · JPSaiseikai Ibaraki Hospital · JPSendai Nishitaga National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The double-blind part of the COMFORT-PD (COMt-inhibitor Findings from Opicapone Repeated Treatment for Parkinson's Disease) study in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations found that both opicapone 25 and 50 mg were significantly more effective than placebo. This 52-week open-label extension study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of opicapone 50 mg tablets in patients who completed the double-blind part of the COMFORT-PD study. Safety was monitored via adverse events, laboratory testing, and physical, cardiovascular and neurological examinations. Efficacy was primarily assessed by change in OFF-time. Secondary efficacy measures included: ON-time, percentage of OFF/ON-time responders, other outcomes from the double-blind part. 391/437 patients were transferred to the open-label extension period and included in the safety analysis set (full analysis set, n = 387; open-label completers, n = 316). Adverse events were frequently reported (n = 338, 86.4%), but < 50% were considered drug-related (39.9%) and few were considered serious (2.6%) or led to discontinuation (2.8%). Decreased OFF-time was consistently observed over the open-label period regardless of initial randomization. Change [LSM (SE)] in OFF-time from the open-label baseline to the last visit showed a persistent effect in patients initially randomized to opicapone 25 mg [- 0.37 (0.20) h, P = 0.0689] and opicapone 50 mg [- 0.07 (0.21) h, P = 0.6913] whereas opicapone 50 mg led to a statistically significant reduction in the previous placebo group [- 1.26 (0.19) h, P < 0.05]. Once-daily opicapone 50 mg was generally well tolerated and consistently reduced OFF-time over 52 weeks in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations.Trial registration JapicCTI-153112; date of registration: December 25, 2015.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsDouble-Blind MethodHumansJapanLevodopaOxadiazolesAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopaopicaponeOxadiazolesJapaneseOpen-labelOpicaponeParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID33630140
PMCPMC7969548
OpenAlexW3133210729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.