Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630139›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with nodular melanoma.

L Susok, M Stücker, F G Bechara, E Stockfleth, T Gambichler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association BetweenDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Protein expression of prognostic genes in primary melanoma and benign nevi.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Susok *Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
M StückerDepartment of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
F G BecharaDepartment of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
E StockflethDepartment of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
T Gambichler *Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany. t.gambichler@klinikum-bochum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-3695
Ruhr University Bochum · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNodular melanoma (NM) is associated with worse disease outcome when compared to superficial spreading melanoma (SSM). We aimed to perform a single-center analysis of prognostic factors in patients with NM and compare the data with SSM patients.

methodsWe studied 228 patients with NN and 396 patients with SSM. Patients with in situ melanomas or stage IV at diagnosis were not included in the study. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curves including the log-rank test, and logistic regression model.

resultsWhen compared to patients with SSM, patients with NM had less likely lower Clark level, higher tumor thickness, less likely tumor regression, more often ulcerated tumors, and less likely a history of precursor lesions such as a nevus. Within a 5-year follow-up we observed significantly more disease relapses and deaths in NM patients than in SSM patients. On multivariate analysis, disease relapse in NM patients was independently predicted by tumor thickness and positive SLNB, whereas melanoma-specific death of NM patients was independently predicted by male sex and tumor thickness. Histologic regression also remained in the logistic regression model as a significant independent negative predictor of NM death.

conclusionsWe did not observe that NM subtype was per se a significant independent predictor for disease relapse or melanoma-specific death. Among the well-known prognostic factors such as tumor thickness and male sex, NM is also associated with other unfavorable factors such as absence of regression.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsFactorsLogistic regressionNodular melanomaPrognosticSuperficial spreading melanomaTumor thickness

Identifiers

PMID33630139
PMCPMC8310843
OpenAlexW3133012053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.