Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630126›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2021

Epiphytic Microbial Diversity of Vitis vinifera Fructosphere: Present Status and Potential Applications.

Yogita Ranade, Indu Sawant, Sujoy Saha, Madhura Chandrashekar, Pranav Pathak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vineyard practices reduce the incidence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yogita RanadeMIT School of Bioengineering Sciences & Research, MIT ADT University, Loni Kalbhor, Maharashtra, 412201, India.
Indu SawantICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra, 412307, India.
Sujoy SahaICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra, 412307, India.
Madhura ChandrashekarMIT School of Bioengineering Sciences & Research, MIT ADT University, Loni Kalbhor, Maharashtra, 412201, India.
Pranav PathakMIT School of Bioengineering Sciences & Research, MIT ADT University, Loni Kalbhor, Maharashtra, 412201, India. pranav.pathak@mituniversity.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vineyard provides an apt environment for growth of different types of microorganisms. The microbial domain is greatly affected by changing climatic conditions, geographical region, water activity, agricultural practices, presence of different pathogens and various pests. Grapevine microbial diversity is also affected by different stages of plant growth. Epiphytic berry microflora is specifically influenced by developmental phases and plays an important role in winemaking which is studied extensively. However, very little information is available about microbial community associated with table grape berries, which are consumed as fresh fruits. Moreover, our knowledge about the important role played by these microbes is precise and their scope might be larger than what is existing in the public domain. A systematic study on effect of developmental stages of table grape berries on microbial diversity would provide new insights for exploring the applicability of these microbes in plant growth, crop protection and bioremediation. In this review, we propose an effort to relate the developmental stages of grape berry with microbial consortium present and at the same time discuss the possible applications of these microbes in plant protection and biodegradation.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaVitisAgricultureFruit

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.