Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630084›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Machine Learning of Patient Characteristics to Predict Admission Outcomes in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.

Hadi Amiri, Isaac S Kohane, Undiagnosed Diseases Network

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02450851 (Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02450851 recruitingnot on this map

Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)Ran2015 to 2028Enrolled20,000ConditionsGenetic Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hadi AmiriDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Isaac S KohaneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Undiagnosed Diseases Network
Harvard University · US

Funding

Coordinating Center for the Undiagnosed Diseases NetworkU01HG007530 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2022
$30.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) is a national network that evaluates individual patients whose signs and symptoms have been refractory to diagnosis. Providing reliable estimates of admission outcomes may assist clinical evaluators to distinguish, prioritize, and accelerate admission to the UDN for patients with undiagnosed diseases. Objective: To develop computational models that effectively predict admission outcomes for applicants seeking UDN evaluation and to rank the applications based on the likelihood of patient admission to the UDN. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included all applications submitted to the UDN from July 2014 to June 2019, with 1209 applications accepted and 1212 applications not accepted. The main inclusion criterion was an undiagnosed condition despite thorough evaluation by a health care professional; the main exclusion criteria were a diagnosis that explained the objective findings or a review of the records that suggested a diagnosis. A classifier was trained using information extracted from application forms, referral letters from health care professionals, and semantic similarity between referral letters and textual description of known mendelian disorders. The admission labels were provided by the case review committee of the UDN. In addition to retrospective analysis, the classifier was prospectively tested on another 288 applications that were not evaluated at the time of classifier development. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were whether a patient was accepted or not accepted to the UDN and application order ranked based on likelihood of admission. The performance of the classifier was assessed by comparing its predictions against the UDN admission outcomes and by measuring improvement in the mean processing time for accepted applications. Results: The best classifier obtained sensitivity of 0.843, specificity of 0.738, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.844 for predicting admission outcomes among 1212 accepted and 1210 not accepted applications. In addition, the classifier can decrease the current mean (SD) UDN processing time for accepted applications from 3.29 (3.17) months to 1.05 (3.82) months (68% improvement) by ordering applications based on their likelihood of acceptance. Conclusions and Relevance: A classification system was developed that may assist clinical evaluators to distinguish, prioritize, and accelerate admission to the UDN for patients with undiagnosed diseases. Accelerating the admission process may improve the diagnostic journeys for these patients and serve as a model for partial automation of triaging or referral for other resource-constrained applications. Such classification models make explicit some of the considerations that currently inform the use of whole-genome sequencing for undiagnosed disease and thereby invite a broader discussion in the clinical genetics community.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPatient SelectionReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultArea Under CurveChildChild, PreschoolComputer SimulationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPatient Admission

Identifiers

PMID33630084
PMCPMC7907957
OpenAlexW3130742604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.