ArticleJAMA oncology2021
Association of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutational Signature-Based Biomarker for Phase II Trial of Olaparib Maintenance in Advanced High-Grade Ovarian Cancer.Cancer science · 2026Trial
- Individualised progesterone receptor modulator prevention strategies for triple-negative breast cancer in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Flexible Modeling of Time-Dependent Covariate Effects in Survival Models With Correlated Competing Risks: Application to the Evaluation of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Women With BRCA1 Pathogenic Variants.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinicopathologic features and contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a multicenter registry study of Japanese women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Article
- The TESTBREAST journey: Revisiting the importance of early detection by frequent screening of women at high risk of breast cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Modification in Women with Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Underpinnings of the Halachic Approach to BRCA Screening and Intervention: Facilitating Provider Counseling for Observant Jewish Populations.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer Screening and Prophylactic Mastectomy for High-Risk Women in Romania.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Role of Breast Cancer Risk Estimation Models to Identify Women Eligible for Genetic Testing and Risk-Reducing Surgery.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Review
- Management ofEcancermedicalscience · 2024Review
- Deciphering Common Traits of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells and Possible Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Use of Period Analysis to Timely Assess Five-Year Relative Survival for Patients with Ovarian Cancer from Taizhou, Eastern China.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Characteristics and survival analysis of breast cancer survivors with metachronous double primary cancers: a retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- The Effect of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy on Breast Cancer Incidence and Histopathological Features in Women with aCancers · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy inCancers · 2023Review
- Global trends inFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The Role of Hormonal Replacement Therapy in BRCA Mutated Patients: Lights and Shadows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceWomen with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. They usually undergo intensive cancer surveillance and may also consider surgical interventions, such as risk-reducing mastectomy or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to reduce ovarian cancer risk, but its association with breast cancer risk is less clear.
objectiveTo assess the association of RRSO with the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis case series included families enrolled in the Breast Cancer Family Registry between 1996 and 2000 that carried an inherited pathogenic variant in BRCA1 (498 families) or BRCA2 (378 families). A survival analysis approach was used that was designed specifically to assess the time-varying association of RRSO with breast cancer risk and accounting for other potential biases. Data were analyzed from August 2019 to November 2020. EXPOSURE: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In all analyses, the primary end point was the time to a first primary breast cancer.
resultsA total of 876 families were evaluated, including 498 with BRCA1 (2650 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 55.8 [19.1] years; 437 White probands [87.8%]) and 378 with BRCA2 (1925 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 57.0 [18.6] years; 299 White probands [79.1%]). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers within 5 years after surgery (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.63] and 0.19 [95% CI, 0.06-0.71], respectively), whereas the corresponding HRs were weaker after 5 years postsurgery (HRs, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.38-0.97] and 0.99 [95% CI; 0.84-1.00], respectively). For BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers who underwent RRSO at age 40 years, the cause-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was 49.7% (95% CI, 40.0-60.3) and 52.7% (95% CI, 47.9-58.7) by age 70 years, respectively, compared with 61.0% (95% CI, 56.7-66.0) and 54.0% (95% CI, 49.3-60.1), respectively, for women without RRSO. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although the primary indication for RRSO is the prevention of ovarian cancer, it is also critical to assess its association with breast cancer risk in order to guide clinical decision-making about RRSO use and timing. The results of this case series suggest a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with RRSO in the immediate 5 years after surgery in women carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, and a longer-term association with cumulative breast cancer risk in women carrying BRCA1 pathogenic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.