Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33630024›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2021

Association of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.

Yun-Hee Choi, Mary Beth Terry, Mary B Daly, Robert J MacInnis, John L Hopper, Sarah Colonna, Saundra S Buys, Irene L Andrulis, Esther M John, Allison W Kurian and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Management ofEcancermedicalscience · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Global trends inFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Yun-Hee ChoiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mary Beth TerryMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Mary B DalyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert J MacInnisCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
John L HopperCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah ColonnaDepartment of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City.
Saundra S BuysDepartment of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City.
Irene L AndrulisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Esther M JohnDepartments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Allison W KurianDepartments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Laurent BriollaisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stanford University · USCancer Council Victoria · AUColumbia University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Utah · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Breast Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA164920 · NCI · CANCER PREVENTION INSTIT OF CALIFORNIA · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE, BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 2012 to 2017
$12.7M
CIHR 110053CIHR 126186CIHR 43821NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceWomen with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. They usually undergo intensive cancer surveillance and may also consider surgical interventions, such as risk-reducing mastectomy or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to reduce ovarian cancer risk, but its association with breast cancer risk is less clear.

objectiveTo assess the association of RRSO with the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis case series included families enrolled in the Breast Cancer Family Registry between 1996 and 2000 that carried an inherited pathogenic variant in BRCA1 (498 families) or BRCA2 (378 families). A survival analysis approach was used that was designed specifically to assess the time-varying association of RRSO with breast cancer risk and accounting for other potential biases. Data were analyzed from August 2019 to November 2020. EXPOSURE: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In all analyses, the primary end point was the time to a first primary breast cancer.

resultsA total of 876 families were evaluated, including 498 with BRCA1 (2650 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 55.8 [19.1] years; 437 White probands [87.8%]) and 378 with BRCA2 (1925 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 57.0 [18.6] years; 299 White probands [79.1%]). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers within 5 years after surgery (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.63] and 0.19 [95% CI, 0.06-0.71], respectively), whereas the corresponding HRs were weaker after 5 years postsurgery (HRs, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.38-0.97] and 0.99 [95% CI; 0.84-1.00], respectively). For BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers who underwent RRSO at age 40 years, the cause-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was 49.7% (95% CI, 40.0-60.3) and 52.7% (95% CI, 47.9-58.7) by age 70 years, respectively, compared with 61.0% (95% CI, 56.7-66.0) and 54.0% (95% CI, 49.3-60.1), respectively, for women without RRSO. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although the primary indication for RRSO is the prevention of ovarian cancer, it is also critical to assess its association with breast cancer risk in order to guide clinical decision-making about RRSO use and timing. The results of this case series suggest a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with RRSO in the immediate 5 years after surgery in women carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, and a longer-term association with cumulative breast cancer risk in women carrying BRCA1 pathogenic variants.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedMutationOvariectomySalpingo-oophorectomyBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33630024
PMCPMC7907985
OpenAlexW3131890375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.