Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629956›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Development and Feasibility of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Qualitative Pilot Study.

Andrew H Kim, Afaf Girgis, Peter De Cruz, Corey A Siegel, Neda Karimi, Sasha O Ruban, Alexandra J Sechi, Wa Sang Watson Ng, Jane M Andrews, Susan J Connor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Pilot trial of iBDecide: Evaluating an online tool to facilitate shared decision making for adolescents and young adults with ulcerative colitis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Patient and Public Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research-A Scoping Review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew H KimIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0044-0212
Afaf GirgisIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-4006
Peter De CruzDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-7236
Corey A SiegelSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2240-6605
Neda KarimiIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2841-637X
Sasha O RubanIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-5829
Alexandra J SechiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-8037
Wa Sang Watson NgIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-6266
Jane M AndrewsIBD Service, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7960-2650
Susan J ConnorIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5606-0270
Liverpool Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision making (SDM) is becoming an important part of ulcerative colitis (UC) management because of the increasing complexity of available treatment choices and their trade-offs. The use of decision aids (DA) may be effective in increasing patients' participation in UC management but their uptake has been limited due to high attrition rates and lack of a participatory approach to their design and implementation.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of Australian patients and their clinicians regarding the feasibility and acceptability of myAID, a web-based DA, in informing treatment decisions in UC. The secondary aim is to use the findings of this pilot study to inform the design of a cluster randomized clinical trial (CRCT) to assess the efficacy of the DA compared with usual care.

methodsmyAID, a DA was designed and developed using a participatory approach by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, patients, and nonmedical volunteers. A qualitative pilot study to evaluate the DA, involving patients with UC facing new treatment decisions and inflammatory bowel disease clinicians, was undertaken.

resultsA total of 11 patients with UC and 15 clinicians provided feedback on myAID. Themes explored included the following: Acceptability and usability of myAID-myAID was found to be acceptable by the majority of clinicians as a tool to facilitate SDM, uptake was thought to vary depending on clinicians' approaches to patient education and practice, potential to overcome time restrictions associated with outpatient clinics was identified, presentation of unbiased information enabling patients to digest information at their own pace was noted, and potential to provoke anxiety among patients with a new diagnosis or mild disease was raised; Perceived role and usefulness of myAID-discordance was observed between patients who prioritized voicing preferences and clinicians who prioritized treatment adherence, and myAID facilitated early discussion of medical versus surgical treatment options; Target population and timing of use-greatest benefit was perceived at the time of initiating or changing treatment and following commencement of immunosuppressive therapy; and Potential concerns and areas for improvement-some perceived that use of myAID may precipitate anxiety by increasing decisional conflict and impact the therapeutic relationship between patient and the clinician and may increase resource requirements.

conclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that patients and clinicians consider myAID as a feasible and acceptable tool to facilitate SDM for UC management. These pilot data have informed a participatory approach to the design of a CRCT, which will evaluate the clinical efficacy of myAID compared with usual care.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617001246370; http://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617001246370.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdolescentAdultColitis, UlcerativeDecision MakingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchYoung Adultdecision aidshared decision makingulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID33629956
PMCPMC7952232
OpenAlexW3081110341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.