Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629870›Full record

ArticleJournal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community2022

Validation of a measure of parental responsiveness: Comparison of the brief Parental Responsiveness Rating Scale with a detailed measure of responsive parental behaviours.

Sarah Ellen Barnett, Penny Levickis, Cristina McKean, Carolyn Letts, Helen Stringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Ellen BarnettSchool of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5715-150X
Penny LevickisSchool of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Cristina McKeanSchool of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Carolyn LettsSchool of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Helen StringerSchool of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parental responsiveness is vital for child language development. Its accurate measurement in clinical settings could identify families who may benefit from preventative interventions; however, coding of responsiveness is time-consuming and expensive. This study investigates in a clinical context the validity of the Parental Responsiveness Rating Scale (PaRRiS): a time- and cost-effective global rating scale of parental responsiveness. Child health nurse (CHN) PaRRiS ratings are compared to a detailed coding of parental responsiveness. Thirty parent-child dyads completed an 8-min free-play session at their 27-month health review. CHNs rated the interaction live using PaRRiS. Videos of these interactions were then blindly coded using the more detailed coding system. PaRRiS ratings and detailed codings were compared using correlational analysis and the Bland-Altman method. PaRRiS and the detailed coding showed a moderate-strong correlation (

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentParentsChild DevelopmentHumansLanguagechildcommunity health nursinglanguage developmentobservational methodsParental behaviourpreschoolscales

Identifiers

PMID33629870
PMCPMC8943477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.