Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629270›Full record

Observational studyIrish journal of medical science2022

The impact of COVID-19 on acute urinary stone presentations: a single-centre experience.

Steven Anderson, Daniel McNicholas, Claudine Murphy, Ijaz Cheema, Liza McLornan, Niall Davis, Mark Quinlan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How did COVID-19 affect acute urolithiasis? An inner Anatolian experience.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven AndersonDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Daniel McNicholasDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Claudine MurphyDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Ijaz CheemaDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Liza McLornanDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Niall DavisDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Mark QuinlanDept of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland. lynagh@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has seen a change in the numbers of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with non-COVID symptoms, resulting in delayed presentations of many medical and surgical conditions.

aimsTo examine the impact of COVID-19 on acute urolithiasis presentations to the ED.

methodsIn this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we reviewed all CT KUBs (and their corresponding cases) ordered in ED for possible acute urolithiasis in a 100-day period immediately prior to COVID-19 and in a 100-day period immediately afterwards. We sought to establish the number of CT KUBs performed and the number confirming urolithiasis. We recorded patients' age, gender, stone size and location. We also analysed CRP, WCC and creatinine as well as the duration of patients' pain and the management strategy adopted for each case.

resultsOne hundred ninety-eight CT KUBs were performed, 94 pre-COVID and 104 intra-COVID. A total of 70.2% (n = 66) and 66.3% (n = 69) were positive for urolithiasis pre-COVID and intra-COVID respectively (p = 0.56). There was a significantly higher percentage of females pre-COVID compared with intra-COVID (54% vs 36%, p = 0.012). There was no difference in median ureteric stone size seen between the groups (4.7 mm pre-COVID vs 4.0 mm intra-COVID, p = 0.179). There were no significant differences in WCC, CRP or creatinine levels. One patient in the pre-COVID group and two in the intra-COVID groups required percutaneous nephrostomies.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic did not result in fewer or sicker patients presenting with acute ureteric colic cases to the ED.

Indexed as

COVID-19Urinary CalculiUrolithiasisEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2AcuteColicCOVID-19EmergencyStoneUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID33629270
PMCPMC7904391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.