ArticleIrish journal of medical science2022
The psychological impact of COVID-19 on ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialists.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of COVID-19 on Otorhinolaryngologists in Bulgaria: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals.Cureus · 2025Article
- The evolution of new and emerging occupational health and safety risks: A qualitative review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Review
- Bariatric surgeons' experiences of working in the first year of the pandemic.Obesity science & practice · 2023Article
- Letter to the editor about the article: "The psychological impact of COVID-19 on ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialists".Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Stress and Anxiety of Otorhinolaryngology Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevalence and Associated Factors.Asia-Pacific journal of public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals working in otolaryngology: a cross-sectional survey.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEar, nose and throat (ENT) specialists are a high-risk group for COVID-19. Although the implications of SARS-CoV-2 infection on physical health are well-documented, the psychological impact is frequently overlooked.
aimsThe aim of this study was to gauge the psychological impact of COVID-19 on ENT specialists in Ireland.
methodsA national, cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to ENT specialists during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic (21
resultsThirty-eight ENT specialists (M/F:24/12, median age, 38.7 years (23-60 years)) completed the survey. About 34% (n = 13) of participants screened positive for an anxiety disorder, of which 2 (5%) had moderate symptoms. The majority of participants (n = 32, 84%) felt ENT specialists had increased exposure to SARS-CoV-2 compared with other medical specialties. Additionally, 32% (n = 12) felt incapable of protecting themselves from infection. An encouraging proportion of ENT specialists (n = 22, 58%) were aware of psychological support available from national and institutional organizations.
conclusionsThe long-term psychological sequelae of COVID-19 will be felt as the physical burden eases. As we adjust to new normalities, ENT surgeons must be conscientious of the mental health issues that arise from the working environment. Sources of anxiety emanated from a lack of control over infection risk, increased vulnerability to COVID-19 relative to other specialties and the implications this has for ENT specialists and their families. Future interventions must focus on increasing awareness of the available psychological support services for our healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.