Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629244›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022

Improved risk-stratification in heart failure patients with mid-range to severe abnormalities of QRS duration and systolic function using mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT.

Takahiro Doi, Tomoaki Nakata, Takahiro Noto, Tomohiro Mita, Satoshi Yuda, Akiyoshi Hashimoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure: What is the next step?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Three-dimensional left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT: Is there a role in cardiac resynchronization therapy?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Takahiro DoiDepartment of Cardiology, Teine Kijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. doitaka518@yahoo.co.jp.
Tomoaki NakataDepartment of Cardiology, Hakodate Goryokaku Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.
Takahiro NotoDepartment of Cardiology, Teine Kijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomohiro MitaDepartment of Cardiology, Teine Kijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoshi YudaDepartment of Cardiology, Teine Kijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akiyoshi HashimotoDepartment of Cardiology, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD), which has been reported to be responsible for unfavorable outcomes, might improve conventional risk-stratification by clinical indices including QRS duration (QRSd) and systolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND

resultsFollowing measurements of 12-lead QRSd and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), three-dimensional (3-D) LVMD was evaluated as a standard deviation (phase SD) of regional mechanical systolic phase angles by gated myocardial perfusion imaging in 829 HF patients. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 37 months with a primary endpoint of lethal cardiac events (CEs). In an overall multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, phase SDs were identified as significant prognostic determinants independently. The patients were divided into 4 groups by combining with the cut-off values of LVEF (35% and 50%) and QRSd (130 ms and 150 ms). The groups with lower LVEF and prolonged QRSd more frequently had CEs than did the other groups. Patient groups with LVEF < 35% and with 35% ≦ LVEF < 50% were differentiated into low-risk and high-risk categories by using an optimal phase SD cut-off value of both QRSd thresholds.

conclusions3-D LVMD can risk-stratify HF patients with mid-range as well as severe abnormalities of QRSd and systolic dysfunction.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHeart FailureMyocardial Perfusion ImagingVentricular Dysfunction, LeftHumansPerfusionStroke VolumeTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentricular Function, LeftHeart failureLeft ventricular mechanical dyssynchronyPrognosisQRS durationRisk-stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.