ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
The risk factors for prolonged hemostatic clip retention after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and validation of a predictive scoring system for titanium clip retention at six months after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction?World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic hemostatic clipping is a safe and efficient treatment used to manage bleeding or perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasm. However, the natural history of applied hemoclips during ESD has not been elucidated. As prolonged clip retention limits the use of magnetic resonance imaging and may impede the ulcer healing process, we investigated the factors associated with prolonged hemoclip retention during gastric ESD.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 199 patients who underwent gastric ESD with hemoclip application from January 2006 to January 2019. The primary outcome was the prolonged hemoclip retention rate 3 months after ESD. We examined the records of subjects followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually after ESD to monitor clip retention.
resultsThe prolonged hemoclip retention rate at 3 months was 27.1% (54/199). The risk of hemoclip retention was significantly lower at the antrum (19.6%, P = 0.03). Hemoclips at the angle tended to remain longer than other locations in the stomach (40.6%, P = 0.081) while there was no difference in the number of applied clips depending upon the location of the lesion. By Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, clips at the antrum detached significantly earlier than those at other locations (P = 0.011).
conclusionsMost of the hemostatic clips attached during ESD were spontaneously removed by 3 months after gastric ESD. However, clips positioned at angle are suspected to have a high probability of prolonged retention. With this in mind, more attention is needed when using hemoclips on angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.