Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629178›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022

Recommendations on postoperative strain and physical labor after abdominal and hernia surgery: an expert survey of attendants of the 41st EHS Annual International Congress of the European Hernia Society.

S Schaaf, A Willms, R Schwab, C Güsgen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S SchaafDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-7090
A WillmsDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany. ArnulfWillms@bundeswehr.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-6735
R SchwabDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
C GüsgenDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-6456
Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no valid recommendations or reliable guidelines available to guide patients how long they should refrain from lifting weights or returning to heavy physical labor after abdominal or hernia surgery. Recent studies found that surgeons' recommendations not to be evidence-based and might be too restrictive considering data on fascial healing and incisional hernia development. It is likely that this impairs the patient's quality of life and leads to remarkable socio-economic costs. Hence, we conducted this survey to gather international expert's opinions on this topic. MATERIALS AND

methodsAt the 41st Annual International Congress of the EHS, attending international experts were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning recommendations on given proposals for postoperative refrain from heavy work or lifting after abdominal surgery and also after hernia repairs.

resultsIn total, 127 experts took part in the survey. 83.9% were consultants with a mean experience since specialization of more than 11 years. Two weeks of no heavy physical strain after laparoscopic surgery were considered sufficient by more than 50% of the participants. For laparotomy, more than 50% rated 4 weeks appropriate. For mesh-augmented sublay and IPOM repair of ventral or incisional hernias, more than 50% rated 4 weeks of rest appropriate. For complex hernia repair, 37% rated 4 weeks reasonable. Two weeks after, groin hernia surgery was considered sufficient by more than 50% of the participants.

conclusionFollowing groin hernia repair (Lichtenstein/endoscopic technique) and laparoscopic operation, the majority agreed on the proposal of 2 weeks refraining from physical strain. Four weeks of no physical strain were considered appropriate by a majority after laparotomy and open incisional hernia repair. However, the results showed substantial variation in the ratings, which indicates uncertainty even in this selected cohort of hernia surgery experts and emphasizes the need for further scientific evaluation. This is particularly remarkable, because a lack of evidence that early postoperative strain leads to higher incisional hernia rates.

trial registrationNumber DRKS00023887.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHernia, VentralLaparoscopyCongresses as TopicEuropeGuidelines as TopicHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaPostoperative ComplicationsSocieties, MedicalSurgical MeshSurveys and QuestionnairesAbdominal surgeryHernia surgeryIncisional herniaPostoperative strain

Identifiers

PMID33629178
PMCPMC9200870
OpenAlexW3133425984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.