Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629150›Full record

ArticlePlanta2021

Ozone uptake at night is more damaging to plants than equivalent day-time flux.

Eleni Goumenaki, Ignacio González-Fernández, Jeremy D Barnes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Eleni GoumenakiPlant and Microbial Biology, School of Natural and Environmental Science [SNES], Devonshire Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. egoumen@hmu.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8405-912X
Ignacio González-FernándezPlant and Microbial Biology, School of Natural and Environmental Science [SNES], Devonshire Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Jeremy D BarnesPlant and Microbial Biology, School of Natural and Environmental Science [SNES], Devonshire Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Mediterranean University · MENewcastle University · GBUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionPlants exposed to equivalent ozone fluxes administered during day-time versus night-time exhibited greater losses in biomass at night and this finding is attributed to night-time depletion of cell wall-localised ascorbate. The present study employed Lactuca sativa and its closest wild relative, L. serriola, to explore the relative sensitivity of plants to ozone-induced oxidative stress during day-time versus night-time. By controlling atmospheric ozone concentration and measuring stomatal conductance, equivalent ozone uptake into leaves was engineered during day and night, and consequences on productivity and net CO

Indexed as

OzonePeriodicityAscorbic AcidBiological TransportLactucaOxidation-ReductionPlant LeavesAscorbic AcidOzoneAir pollutionClimate changeDiel ozone sensitivityNight-time exposureOzone detoxification and repair

Identifiers

PMID33629150
PMCPMC7904732
OpenAlexW3130857507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.